Priyanka Communications India Pvt Ltd v. Tata Capital Financial Services Limited

501. IA 434-25 in COMSS 87-22.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION by NIKITA YOGESH GADGIL Date:

2025.12.18 11:18:54 +0530 NIKITA YOGESH GADGIL INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 434 OF 2025 IN COMMERCIAL SUMMARY SUIT NO. 87 OF 2022 Priyanka Communications (India) Pvt. Ltd.

...Applicant In the matter between Tata Capital Financial Services Ltd.

...Plaintiff V/s.

Priyanka Communications (India) Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. ...Defendants Mr. Rohan Savant with Mr. Shadab Jan,Mr. Aman Sarat, Mr. Sachin Chandarana and Ms. Aishwarya Mehta i/b Manilal Kher Ambalal & Co. for the Plaintiff.

Ms. Rehman Lokhandwala with Mr. Hrishikesh Nadkarni andMr. Siddharth Seshadri i/b Pan India Legal Services LLP for the Defendants.

CORAM

:

ABHAY AHUJA, J.

DATE :

17th DECEMBER, 2025 P.C. :

1.

This matter has been listed on the production board today as in the morning session it was mentioned that in the written submissions that were permitted to be filed, the Defendants have made submissions in addition to what was argued before this Court. 2.

When the matter is called out, Ms. Lokhandwala, learned Counsel appears for the Defendants and submits that she has instructions to redact / delete part-1 in paragraph-1, part-2 in paragraph 3 sub-Clause (d) and Paragraphs 17 to 27 of the written submissions filed on behalf fo the Defendants. Nikita Gadgil 1/2

501. IA 434-25 in COMSS 87-22.doc 3.

Mr. Savant, learned Counsel appearing for the Plaintiff is agreeable to the said redaction / deletion.

4.

Since the matter had been reserved on 26th November, 2025, after hearing the learned Counsel and closed for orders with liberty to file written submissions within a period of two weeks, which ended on 11th December, 2025, by when both the sides had put in the written submissions, however, since the grievance had been made on behalf of the Plaintiff as noted above and the matter is listed on the production board today, before passing any order, in the fitness of things, this Court de-reserves the said matter.

5.

However, in view of the aforesaid submissions made in the matter, the Interim Application is deemed heard once again and closed for orders.

6.

Liberty to file written submissions during the course of the week. (ABHAY AHUJA, J.) Nikita Gadgil 2/2