Deepa Sandip More v. Yashwanti Jaisinghrao Suryawanshi

1/2 28-ia-1287 -25.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION IN ITS COMMERCIAL DIVISION

(28) INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 1287 OF 2025 IN COMMERCIAL SUIT NO. 1537 OF 2018 Deepa Sandip More ...Applicant/Plaintiff

Versus

Yashwanti Jaisinghrao Suryawanshi ...Defendant WITH

(29) INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 1621 OF 2025 IN COMMERCIAL SUIT NO. 1537 OF 2018 Deepa Sandip More ...Applicant/Plaintiff

Versus

Yashwanti Jaisinghrao Suryawanshi ...Defendant ----- Mr. Siddharth Joshi a/w Mr. Sunil Gangan, Mr. Swapnil Shikare i/b RMG Law Associates for Applicant/Plaintiff.

Mr. Ajay Panicker a/w Ms Lavanya Panicker i/b Ajay Law Associates for Defendants.

----- CORAM : ARIF S. DOCTOR, J.

th DECEMBER, 2025.

DATE : 10 P.C:

In so far as Interim Application (l) No.1621 of 2025 is concerned, learned counsel for the Defendant does not have any objection and in any view of the matter, the amendment is entirely formal in nature and would Meera Jadhav

2/2 28-ia-1287 -25.doc have to be allowed in the substantive cause of justice. Interim Application (L) No.1621 of 2025 is accordingly disposed of. In so far as Interim Application (L) No.1287 of 2025 is concerned, after hearing the learned counsel, I am of the view that given that the Interim application essentially is to bring on record certain facts and this is a pretrial amendment, for the reasons set out in the interim application, the same would have to be allowed. However, learned counsel for the Defendant has sought time to take instructions and if necessary, file affidavit in reply within a period of two weeks from today.

Reply to be filed within two weeks from today. List the interim application for hearing on 14 th January 2026.

[ARIF S. DOCTOR, J.] Meera Jadhav