Mihir Pratap Vasa v. Pratap Maneklala Vasa

39-ia-1679-2024.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

TESTAMENTARY AND INTESTATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO.1679 OF 2024 IN CAVEAT (L) NO.27702 OF 2023 IN TESTAMENTARY PETITION NO.4052 OF 2022 VISHAL SUBHASH PAREKAR VISHAL SUBHASH PAREKAR Date: 2024.07.18 10:58:35 +0530 Mihir Pratap Vasa ...Applicant vs.

Pratap Maneklala Vasa

...Respondent

Ms. Shivani Bhatia i/b. Vis Legis Law Practice, for the Applicant Mr. Pranav Monani i/b. Kanga & Co., for the Petitioner. CORAM :

N. J. JAMADAR, J.

DATE :

JULY 16, 2024 P.C.:

1.

Heard the learned counsel for the parties.

2.

This application is preferred for condonation of 1 day's delay in filing the Caveat and 25 days delay in filing affidavit in support of the Caveat.

3.

Perused the averments in the application.

4.

The applicant has ascribed justifiable reasons for condonation of delay.

5.

Thus to advance the cause of substantive justice, the application stands allowed in terms of prayer clause (a) and (b). 6.

The delay in filing the Caveat and affidavit in support of the Caveat, stands condoned.

Vishal Parekar ...1

39-ia-1679-2024.doc 7.

The Caveat be taken on record and registered. 8.

The affidavit in support of the Caveat be also taken on record. 9.

The petition be converted into Testamentary Suit. Application disposed.

(N. J. JAMADAR, J.) Vishal Parekar ...2