← Library
Bombay High CourtIA/3337/2024dismissed

Arundhati Bhaskar Madankar v. Urmil Sunil Shet Nee Ratnamala Vasant Chavan

2024-12-02Hon'Ble Shri Justice Milind N. Jadhav2 pages

SANTOSH SUBHASH KULKARNI 29-IA3337-2024INCTSL31882-2024.DOC Santosh SANTOSH SUBHASH KULKARNI Date: 2024.12.03 10:52:14 +0530

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

TESTAMENTARY AND INTESTATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 3337 OF 2024 IN CAVEAT (L) NO. 31882 OF 2024 IN TESTAMENTARY PETITION NO. 4172 OF 2024 Arundhati Bhaskar Madanka ...Applicant/ Caveator

Versus

Urmil Sunil Shet @ Ratnamala Vasant Chavan

...Respondent/

Petitioner Ms. Mitali Dhoble, for the Applicant - Caveator. Ms. Kanhaiya Yadav, for Original Petitioner in TP/4172/2024 and for the Respondent in IA/3337/2024.

CORAM:

N. J. JAMADAR, J.

DATED:

2nd DECEMBER, 2024 PC:- 1.

Heard the learned Counsel for the parties.

2.

The learned Counsel for the original petitioner seeks time to file an affidavit-in-reply.

3.

Let the affidavit-in-reply be filed within a period of four weeks.

4.

In the event, affidavit-in-reply is filed within the said period and its copy served on the applicant, the applicant is at liberty to file an affidavit-in-rejoinder within a period of two weeks thereafter.

1/2

29-IA3337-2024INCTSL31882-2024.DOC 5.

Stand over to 27th January, 2025.

[N. J. JAMADAR, J.] 2/2