Commissioner Of Income Tax It 2 Mumbai v. Elvis Zepherin Crasto

KAWRE KIRAN KALYAN KAWRE KIRAN KALYAN Date: 2024.12.07 17:34:37 +0530 904-IA-3408-2024 (OS).DOC

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 3408 OF 2024 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 30780 OF 2024 Commissioner Of Income Tax- (IT)-2M Mumbai ...Applicant Commissioner Of Income Tax- (IT)-2M Mumbai

Versus

Elvis Zepherin Crasto

...Respondent

Mr. Prathmesh Bhosle, for the Applicant.

_______________________

CORAM:

G. S. KULKARNI & ADVAIT M. SETHNA, JJ.

DATE 04 DECEMBER 2024 _______________________ P.C.

1.

We have heard Mr. Prathmesh Bhosle, learned counsel for the applicant. 2.

By this application, the applicant has prayed for condonation of delay of 226 days in filing the aforesaid appeal under the provisions of Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

3.

Despite Service, none appears for respondent. 4.

We have perused the averments as made in the application, which make out a sufficient case for the delay to be condoned. Also, there is no opposition placed on record on behalf of the respondent to this Application. 5.

In the aforesaid circumstances, it is in the interests of justice that the application is allowed. It is accordingly allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). 6.

Office objections, if any, be removed within a period of six weeks from today, failing which, the appeal shall stand dismissed without further reference to the Court. (ADVAIT M. SETHNA, J.) (G. S. KULKARNI , J.) 04 December 2024 Kiran Kawre