← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/73/2026disposed off

Sunita Surykant Parve And ORS v. The Tahsildar Agriculture Lands Tribunal Daund And ORS

2026-06-09Hon'Ble The Acting Chief Justice , Hon'Ble Shri Justice Gautam A. Ankhad2 pages

7-WP-73-2026-(C).odt by SUNNY ANKUSHRAO THOTE Date:

2026.06.11 15:02:14 +0530

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

SUNNY ANKUSHRAO THOTE CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 73 OF 2026 Sunita Surykant Parve & Ors.

...Petitioners

Versus

The Tahsildar/Agriculture Lands Tribunal Daund, Tal. Daund Dist. Pune & Ors.

...Respondents

Mr. Tushar N. Sonawane, Advocate for the Petitioners. Mrs. Neha Bhide, G.P. a/w Mr. Ketan Joshi, 'B' Panel Counsel for the Respondent/State.

CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, ACJ.

& GAUTAM A. ANKHAD, J.

DATE : 9th JUNE, 2026 P.C. :- 1.

The Application (undated) tendered by the Petitioner to Respondent No.1, Tahasildar/Agriculture Lands Tribunal Daund, Taluka Daund, District Pune, which is received by the said Authority on 25th July, 2025, is said to be filed under Section 70-b and Section 40 of the Bombay Tenancy & Agricultural Lands Act, 1948. It is prayed that the said Authority be directed to decide the said Application under the concerned provisions of law, expeditiously.

SUNNY THOTE

7-WP-73-2026-(C).odt 2.

The learned AGP representing the State submits that the Application tendered by the Petitioner is in relation to an order passed on 25th January, 1967 in a proceeding no.32G/Dhond/109/ 1966, before the Agricultural Lands Tribunal, Dhond, Taluka Dhond, District Poona.

3.

Considering the above, we have no reason to entertain this Petition. We would however observe that Respondent No.1 may deal with the pending Application filed under Section 70-b and Section 40 of the Bombay Tenancy & Agricultural Lands Act, 1948, by following the due procedure and on its own merits, within a period of 120 days from today.

4.

In view of the above direction, this Writ Petition is disposed off.

5.

Needless to state, all contentions of the stakeholders are kept open and a reasonable opportunity of hearing shall be granted to each of them.

(GAUTAM A. ANKHAD, J.) (ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE) SUNNY THOTE