Sunita Dnyaneshwar Jagtap v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

2026:BHC-AUG:7665-DB 922-wp-237-2026.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 922 WRIT PETITION NO.237 OF 2026 Sunita Dnyaneshwar Jagtap

VERSUS

The State Of Maharashtra And Others ...

Mr. Shashikant E. Shekade, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr. A. M. Phule, AGP for Respondents/State.

...

CORAM : SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI & HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR, JJ.

DATE : 18 FEBRUARY 2026 ORDER :

.

Heard learned Advocate for the petitioner.

2.

After disinclination is shown to grant any relief, learned Advocate for the petitioner, upon instructions, seeks withdrawal of the petition with liberty to avail alternate remedy.

3.

Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of as withdrawn with liberty as prayed.

[ HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR ] [ SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI ] JUDGE JUDGE scm [1]