Manzoor Ahmed Mehmood Shaikh v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

1 919&921WP408.2026.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 919 WRIT PETITION NO. 408 OF 2026 Manzoor Ahmed Mehmood Shaikh

VERSUS

The State Of Maharashtra And Others AND 921 WRIT PETITION NO. 410 OF 2026 Sadashiv Uttam Rathod

VERSUS

The State Of Maharashtra And Others ...

In both Petitions:

Mr. Anand V. Patil Indrale - Advocate for the Petitioner Mr. A. M. Phule - AGP for State in WP No. 408 of 2026 Mr. S. B. Pulkundwar - AGP for State in WP No. 410 of 2026 ...

CORAM : SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI AND HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR, JJ.

DATED : 17TH FEBRUARY, 2026 PER COURT : - 1.

Learned Advocate for the Petitioner in both the Petitions submits that, after filing the Petitions, the decision has been taken by Respondent No. 22 and, therefore, the matters have become infructuous. 2.

In view of the above statement, the Petitions stand disposed of as having become infructuous.

[HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR] [SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI] JUDGE JUDGE SG Punde Signed by: Sandeep Gulabrao Punde Designation: PS To Honourable Judge Date: 20/02/2026 10:51:56