Nazir Kadir Shikh v. Jaitun Mamud Shaikh (Since Deceased, Thr His Hrs And Legal Representativesand) ORS

Ajay IN IN THE THE HIGH HIGH COURT COURT OF OF JUDICATURE JUDICATURE AT AT BOMBAY BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 408 OF 2026 Nazir Kadir Shaikh .. Petitioner

Versus

Jaitun Mamud Shaikh (Since deceased, through his HRS and Legal Representative) and Ors.

.. Respondents ....................

 Mr. Abhijit B. Kadam a/w. Ms. Akanksha Gond, Ms. Shubhangi Phadtare, Advocates for Petitioner.

 Mr. Manish S. Kelkar a/w. Saurav Ambavane and Ms. Gauri Phadake, Advocate for Respondent Nos.7 to 21. ....................

CORAM

: MILIND N. JADHAV, J.

DATE : JANUARY 13, 2026.

P.C.:

1.

Heard Mr. Kadam, learned Advocate for Petitioner and Mr. Kelkar, learned Advocate for Respondent Nos.7 to 21. 2.

Parties have reconciled their disputes and filed Minutes of Order. Today, Minutes of dated 13.01.2026 executed between the Petitioner and Respondent Nos.1 to 21 are filed in Court and the same is taken on record and marked 'X' for identification. Minutes of Order are duly signed by Petitioner and the Power of Attorney Holder of Respondent Nos.1 to 7. Parties are present in Court today and are identified by the learned Advocates appearing for the respective parties. They confirm execution of the Minutes of Order.

3.

Minutes of Order are running in to 20 pages. For the sake of reference and convenience, first 3 pages upto the execution clause of the Minutes of Order are scanned and reproduced below:-

4.

The obligations and undertakings given in the Minutes of Order are accepted as undertakings given to the Court. 5.

Order in terms of Minutes of Order passed in Writ Petition. 6.

In view of the above, Writ Petition is disposed. [ MILIND N. JADHAV, J. ] Ajay