Shaynaj Imam Shaikh v. The State Of Maharashtra And Another

2026:BHC-AUG:8532-DB 932-WP-1018-26.odt {1}

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 932 WRIT PETITION NO. 1018 OF 2026 Shaynaj Imam Shaikh

VERSUS

The State Of Maharashtra And Another ......

Mr. Avinash D. Aghav,, Advocate for Petitioner Mr.S.B. Pulkundwar, AGP for Respondents No.1 and 2 ......

CORAM : SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI AND HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR, JJ.

DATE : 25 FEBRUARY, 2026 PER COURT :- 1.

Present petition has been filed for direction to respondent No.2 to consider and decide the application dated 16.04.2025 submitted by the petitioner for receiving the family pension. 2.

Learned AGP waives service of notice for respondents No.1 and 2 and upon instructions from respondent No.2, makes a statement that the said proposal would be decided within a period of two (2) weeks from today. The said statement is taken as undertaking. 3.

We dispose of the writ petition by directing respondent No.2 to consider and decide the said application dated 16.04.2025 within a period of two (2) weeks from today.

[ HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR ] [ SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI ] JUDGE JUDGE S P Rane