← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/1026/2025disposed off

Suresh Dhondu Bagul And ANR v. Deputy Executive Engineer Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Co Ltd And ORS

2025-01-29Hon'Ble Shri Justice G. S. Kulkarni , Hon'Ble Justice Advait M. Sethna2 pages

2025:BHC-AUG:2198-DB 28 WP NO. 1019 OF 2025.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 1019 OF 2025 JAGAN NANA SONWANE

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR AND OTHERS AND WRIT PETITION NO. 1022 OF 2025 MOHAN NANA ALHAT

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR AND OTHERS AND WRIT PETITION NO. 1026 OF 2025 ASHARAM SHANKAR WAGH DIED THR LRS RUKHMANBAI ASHARAM WAGH AND ANOTHER

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR AND OTHERS ...

Advocate for the Petitioners in respective petitions : Mr. Chincholkar Ganpat Niranjan AGP for Respondents/State in respective petitions : Mr. R. K. Ingole, M. M. Nerlikar and Mr. V. M. Kagne ...

CORAM

:

MANGESH S. PATIL & PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR , JJ.

DATE : 27.01.2025 1/2

28 WP NO. 1019 OF 2025.odt PER COURT :

.

The petitioners are seeking regularization of their encroachment, which cannot be directed by way of writ of mandamus in the light of Jagpal Singh and others Vs. State of Punjab and others, (2011) 11 SCC 396 and subsequent Government Resolution dated 08.11.1991.

2.

In fact, already by the order dated 22.01.2024, passed in WP No. 715 of 2024, petitioner's representation was directed to be considered in accordance with law.

3.

There cannot be repetitive orders in respect of the same cause.

4.

The Writ Petitions are disposed of with liberty to the petitioners to resort to the appropriate remedy as is available to them in law.

( PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR, J.) (MANGESH S. PATIL, J.) jhs/ 2/2