Bank Of Maharashtra v. State Of Maharashtra And ORS

RAMESHWAR LAXMAN DILWALE 9-WP-1219-25.doc Rameshwar Dilwale RAMESHWAR LAXMAN DILWALE Date: 2025.01.31 10:20:35 +0530

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.1219 OF 2025 Bank of Maharashtra .. Petitioner Vs.

The State of Maharashtra & Ors.

.. Respondents ...

Mr. Sanjay Anabhawane a/w Ms. Tejaswi Nanche, Ms. Komal Bhosale i/by Ms. Medha M. Rane, Advocates for the Petitioner. Mr. N. C. Walimbe, Additional Government Pleader with Mr. P. G. Sawant, Assistant Government Pleader for the respondent -State. Mr. Chetan D. Oswal, Advocate for the respondent nos.2 and 4 to 7.

Mr. Raj Chourasia with Mr. Pranil Sonawane, Advocates for the respondent no.9.

...

CORAM : A.S. CHANDURKAR & M.M. SATHAYE, JJ DATE : 30TH JANUARY 2025.

P.C. :

1.

We have heard the learned counsel for the parties. Given the fact that the respondent nos.4 to 7 have approached the Debts Recovery Tribunal raising a challenge to the steps taken by petitioner for enforcement of its security interest, it is not necessary to entertain the writ petition. Needless to observe that it would be open for the petitioner to move the respondent no.3 Tahsildar for seeking enforcement and implementation of the order passed under Section 14 of the Securitization and 1/2

9-WP-1219-25.doc Rameshwar Dilwale Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002. If such application is moved, same shall be considered in accordance with law. Keeping all points raised in the writ petition open, it is disposed of as not entertained. [ M.M. SATHAYE, J. ] [ A.S. CHANDURKAR, J. ] 2/2