← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/1245/2025disposed off

Nirmala Satish Kothari v. Mangal Anandrao Avhad

2025-04-24Hon'Ble Shri Justice Kishore C. Sant2 pages

2025:BHC-AUG:12275 1 920-wp 1245-2025.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 1245 OF 2025 Nirmala Satish Kothari .. Petitioner

Versus

Mangal Anandrao Avhad .. Respondent Mr. Adinath B. Jagtap, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr. Ajinkya Kale, Advocate i/by Talekar & Associates for the Respondent.

CORAM :

KISHORE C. SANT, J.

DATED : 24th APRIL, 2025.

P. C. :- .

Heard learned advocate for the petitioner and learned advocate for the respondent.

2.

By way of impugned order the learned Trial Judge has rejected the application that was filed by the petitioner - defendant for accepting her written statement on record. The learned advocate for the petitioner submits that, the valuable right of the defendant is taken away. He prays that, the application be allowed by allowing the writ petition and impugned order be quashed and set aside. 3.

The learned advocate for the respondent - plaintiff vehemently opposes the petition. He submits that, the petitioner has failed to file

2 920-wp 1245-2025.odt written statement within 90 days as per the mandate of Order VIII of the Code of Civil Procedure. He supports the order. 4.

This Court finds that, though there is delay on the part of the petitioner in filing the written statement, the same is tried to be justified in any case. It is already held by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Salem Advocate Bar Association Vs. Union Of India reported in MANU/SC/0912/2002 that the amendment is directory and not mandatory.

5.

Considering that, the defendants valuable right would be taken away if no written statement is permitted. In view of the same, this Court is inclined to allow the writ petition. 6.

The writ petition stands allowed in terms of prayer clause (B). However, in the facts of the case, this order is subject to petitioner paying cost of Rs. 5,000/- (Rs. Five Thousand only) to be paid to the respondent - original plaintiff in the learned Trial Court within six (06) weeks from today.

7.

With this, the writ petition stands disposed of. ( KISHORE C. SANT, J. ) P.S.B.