Nitesh Jayram Vishe And ANR v. Abubakar Samiullah Siddiqui And ORS

13-WP-2176-2025.DOC Arun Sankpal

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2176 OF 2025 Nitesh Jayram Vishe & Anr ..Petitioners

Versus

Abubakar Samiullah Siddiqui & Ors

...Respondents

Mr. R.D. Suryawanshi, for the Petitioner.

CORAM:

N. J. JAMADAR, J.

DATED :

18th FEBRUARY 2025 P.C.:

1.

Heard learned Counsel for the Petitioners.

2.

The learned Counsel for the Petitioners, on instructions, submit that the Petitioners do not wish to press the Petition. 3.

The learned Counsel for the Petitioners further submits that the trial court has granted ex parte injunction by an order dated 21st August 2023.

ARUN RAMCHANDRA SANKPAL 4.

The Application, on which the impugned order has been passed, by ARUN RAMCHANDRA SANKPAL Date: 2025.02.20 11:16:37 +0530 was, according to the learned Counsel for the Petitioners, actuated by a design to delay the disposal of the Application for temporary injunction. Therefore, the learned Counsel submits that the trial court be directed 1/2

13-WP-2176-2025.DOC to hear and decide the Application for temporary injunction expeditiously.

5.

Since the trial court has granted ex parte injunction, the prayer for expeditious hearing of the Application for temporary injunction appears justifiable.

6.

Petition stands dismissed as not pressed.

7.

The learned Civil Jude seized with RCS No 374 of 2023 is requested to hear and decide the Application for temporary injunction (Exhibit "5") as expeditiously as possible and preferably within a period of four months from date of filing of the report by the Court Commissioner.

[N. J. JAMADAR, J.] 2/2