Shrikant Babu Satvekar v. Sangli Miraj Kupwad City Corporation Thr. Its Officer Rajendra V. Kakde

501-cra-83-2025.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.83 OF 2025 Baban Shankar Lavte ...Applicant vs.

Sangli Miraj Kupwad City Corporation

...Respondent

VISHAL SUBHASH PAREKAR VISHAL SUBHASH PAREKAR by VISHAL SUBHASH PAREKAR Date: 2025.02.18 10:32:36 +0530 Mr. Murtuza Nazami i/b. Mr. Rohan Waghmare, for the Applicant. Mr. Vikram Walawalkar a/w. Mr. Iqra Qureshi, for the Respondent. VISHAL SUBHASH PAREKAR Date: 2025.02.19 10:53:10 +0530 CORAM :

N. J. JAMADAR, J.

DATE :

FEBRUARY 17, 2025 P.C:

1.

Heard the learned counsel for the applicant.

2.

The learned counsel for the applicant seeks leave to carry out the amendment.

3.

Leave granted.

4.

Necessary amendment be carried out forthwith. 5.

If the necessary amendment is carried out, list the application as a fresh matter tomorrow.

(N. J. JAMADAR, J.) Vishal Parekar, PS ...1