Union Bank Of India v. State Of Maharashtra And ORS

28-wp-3463-2025.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 3463 OF 2025 Union Bank of India through its Authorised Representative ...

Petitioner V/s.

State of Maharashtra through Govt.

Pleader and Ors.

...

Respondents ------------------- Mr. Abhishek Samant a/w Pranali Rawool, for the Petitioner. Mr. Bapusaheb Dahiphale, AGP, for the Respondent Nos. 1,3 4 and 5. Mr. Sandesh Patil a/w Divya Pawar and Krishnakant Deshmukh, for the Respondent no. 2.

--------------------

CORAM

:

N.J. JAMADAR, J.

VARSHA DEEPAK GAIKWAD VARSHA DEEPAK GAIKWAD Date: 2025.03.15 14:16:18 +0530 DATE :

11TH MARCH 2025.

PC:

1.

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2.

The challenge in this petition is to an order dated 23rd December 2024 passed by the learned Civil Judge, Senior Division, Palghar whereby till the applications for rejection of the plaint and to vacate status quo order are decided, the parties were directed to maintain the status quo. The said order has since been continued. 3.

It is the grievance of the petitioner that the application for rejection of the plaint is not being heard. The petitioner has preferred the said application, on the premises that the suit is barred under the varsha

28-wp-3463-2025.doc provisions of Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest (for short, 'SARFAESI') Act, 2002. 3.

Having regard to the nature of the order, it would be expedient to request the learned Civil Judge seized with Suit No. 22 of 2024 to hear and decide the application for rejection of the plaint and other interim applications as expeditiously as possible. 4.

The parties shall co-operate with the Court in the hearing and disposal of the application and shall not seek any adjournment. 5.

Petition disposed.

(N.J. JAMADAR, J.) varsha