Chhaya Sandu Sagre Alias Chhaya Pandit Bramane v. The State Of Maharashtra Through Its Secretary And Others

Sayyed 503-WP.4261.2025.docx IN IN THE THE HIGH HIGH COURT COURT OF OF JUDICATURE JUDICATURE AT AT BOMBAY BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.4261 OF 2025 WRIT PETITION NO.4261 OF 2025 Versatile Engineering Versatile Engineering (through its authorized signatory) (through its authorized signatory) ...

...Petitioner

Petitioner

Versus

Versus

Chief Executive Officer - Maharashtra Chief Executive Officer - Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation & Ors.

Industrial Development Corporation & Ors.

...

...Respondents

Respondents _____________________________________________________ Mr. Partho Sarkar a/w Mr. Pratik Sarkar & Mr. G. Shyma Kumar i/b. Mr. Partho Sarkar a/w Mr. Pratik Sarkar & Mr. G. Shyma Kumar i/b. Vidhi Legal for the Petitioner.

Vidhi Legal for the Petitioner.

Mr. Prashant Chavan, Senior Advocate a/w Mr. Meet Vora i/b. Navdeep Mr. Prashant Chavan, Senior Advocate a/w Mr. Meet Vora i/b. Navdeep Vora & Associates for Respondent Nos.1 and 2. Vora & Associates for Respondent Nos.1 and 2. _____________________________________________________ CORAM :

M. S. Sonak & Jitendra Jain, JJ.

DATED : 26 March 2025 PC.:- 1.

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2.

Mr.

Mr.

Chavan Chavan, learned senior advocate appearing for , learned senior advocate appearing for Respondent Nos.1 and 2 points out that this matter as nothing to do Respondent Nos.1 and 2 points out that this matter as nothing to do with Land Acquisition or Requisition. As such, he submits that this with Land Acquisition or Requisition. As such, he submits that this petition may not pertain to the assignment of this Bench. petition may not pertain to the assignment of this Bench. 3.

Mr.

Mr. Sarkar Sarkar, learned counsel for the Petitioner points out that , learned counsel for the Petitioner points out that our assignment relates not only to writ petitions relating to the Land our assignment relates not only to writ petitions relating to the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 but too "all other matters relating to acquisition Acquisition Act, 1894 but too "all other matters relating to acquisition and requisition of properties". He emphasizes on the word "other". and requisition of properties". He emphasizes on the word "other". 4.

The Petitioner was allotted a plot in the MIDC Industrialist The Petitioner was allotted a plot in the MIDC Industrialist Estate. Mr.

Estate. Mr. Sarkar Sarkar states that the Petitioner has not been granted an states that the Petitioner has not been granted an extension which, in terms of MIDC Circular, the Petitioner was entitled. extension which, in terms of MIDC Circular, the Petitioner was entitled. Mr. Chavan states that this is a case of cancellation of the allotment. Mr. Chavan states that this is a case of cancellation of the allotment.

Sayyed 503-WP.4261.2025.docx 5.

In either cases, we do not see how this matter would pertain In either cases, we do not see how this matter would pertain to acquisition or requisition of properties in the sense in which the same to acquisition or requisition of properties in the sense in which the same is referred to in the assignment.

is referred to in the assignment.

6.

For the above reasons, we direct the Registry to place the For the above reasons, we direct the Registry to place the matter before the appropriate Bench having the assignment to deal with matter before the appropriate Bench having the assignment to deal with these type of matters.

these type of matters.

(Jitendra Jain, J.) (M. S. Sonak, J.) Signed by: Sayyed Saeed Ali Designation: PA To Honourable Judge Date: 27/03/2025 11:08:22