← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/5036/2025disposed off

Narasimha Sayanna Mehetre v. Deputy Director Of Education And ORS

2025-06-11Hon'Ble Shri Justice Ravindra V. Ghuge , Hon'Ble Shri Justice M. M. Sathaye2 pages

Digitally signed by GAURI AMIT GAEKWAD Date:

2025.06.12 11:19:07 +0530 GAURI AMIT GAEKWAD 12@21.WP-3112-2025.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

(12) WRIT PETITION NO.3112 OF 2025 Padma Shekhar Sidhayolu and Anr.

....Petitioners

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and Ors.

....Respondents AND

(21) WRIT PETITION NO.5036 OF 2025 Narasimha Sayanna Mehetre ....Petitioner

Versus

Deputy Director of Education and Ors.

....Respondents ---- Mr. Narendra V. Bandiwadekar, Senior Advocate a/w. Mr. Vinayak R. Kumbhar, Mr. Rajendra B. Khaire and Mr. Aniket S. Phapale i/b. Mrs. Ashwini N. Bandiwadekar for the Petitioners in WP/3112/2025 and for Respondent Nos.3 and 4 in WP/5036/2025. Mr. Ajay Panicker a/w. Ms. Deepti Shirdokar i/b. Ajay Law Associates for the Petitioner in WP/5036/2025 and Respondent Nos.4 and 5 in WP/3112/2025.

Mr. P.P. Kakade, Addl. GP a/w. Ms. P.N. Diwan, AGP for Respondent Nos.1 to 3 in WP/3112/2025.

Mr. P.P. Kakade, Addl. GP a/w. Mr. V.M. Mali, AGP for Respondent Nos.1, 2 and 7 in WP/5036/2025.

---- CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE & M.M. SATHAYE, JJ.

DATE : 11th JUNE, 2025 P.C. :- WRIT PETITION NO.3112 OF 2025 AND WRIT PETITION NO.5036 OF 2025 1.

The learned Senior Advocate as well as the learned Advocate appearing on behalf of the Petitioners in both these Petitions, submit that the Respondent - Deputy Director, Gauri Gaekwad

12@21.WP-3112-2025.odt Department of Education, Mumbai, should consider the report of the Education Officer and pass an appropriate order. Both submit that these Petitions can be disposed off by directing the said Authority to pass an order within a specified timeline.

2.

In view of the above, both these Petitions are disposed off with a direction that the said Authority shall follow the due procedure laid down in law and pass an appropriate order with reasons, within a period of 60 days from today. 3.

If any party is aggrieved by the order, which is to be passed by the said Authority, liberty to avail of a remedy as is permissible in law. All contentions of the parties are also kept open. (M.M. SATHAYE, J.) (RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.) Gauri Gaekwad