← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/6872/2025disposed off

Motilal Oswal Home Finance Limited Thr. Authorised Officers v. The State Of Maharashtra District Magistrate Amravati And ORS

2025-07-04Hon'Ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik , Hon'Ble Shri Justice N. R. Borkar2 pages

911-WP-6872-2025 (C).doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 6872 OF 2025 Motilal Oswal Home Finance Limited Thr. Authorised Officers

...Petitioner

VERSUS

The State Of Maharashtra District Magistrate Amravati And Ors.

...Respondents

....

Adv. Mahesh Swami a/w Adv. Shreyas Deshpande i/by Mr. Navin Arora, Advocate for the Petitioner.

Ms. G. R. Raghuwanshi, AGP for the Respondent - State. ....

CORAM

:

M. S. KARNIK & N. R. BORKAR, JJ.

DATE :

04th JULY, 2025 P.C.

:

1.

The reliefs prayed in this petition are for directions to respondent No.1 - The State of Maharashtra/District Magistrate, Amravati to restore the possession of Secured Assets, i.e., Gat No.120, At Post Rui Upadhya Nagar Tal. Baramati, Dist Pune - 413102, Maharashtra with the help of respondent No.2 - Station House Officer, Pasan Police Station in the presence of the authorised officer of the petitioner bank. 2.

Learned AGP submitted that the Resident Deputy Tehsildar and Executive Magistrate Baramati had already handed over the possession of the secured assets to the petitioner bank. As the possession was handed over and as ZIP

911-WP-6872-2025 (C).doc there is no provision under the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 ("SARFAESI Act" for short) to initiate action for repossession of the property if the same is dispossessed, learned AGP requested this Court to pass appropriate orders.

3.

The issue raised by learned AGP is no longer res integra in view of the decision of this Court in Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd. & Anr. vs. State of Maharashtra & Anr.1. This Court has clearly held that there is no prohibition for the District Magistrate or his delegate to re-exercise the powers to execute the order passed under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act. In this view of the matter, the petition is allowed in terms of prayer clause "b".

4.

If police protection is necessary, the same be provided on petitioner-bank paying the necessary charges, which the petitioner-bank is ready and willing. The steps to repossess the property and restore the possession to the petitioner be taken within a period of 10 weeks from today.

5.

The petition is disposed of in aforesaid terms. 6.

List the matter for compliance on 10th October 2025. (N. R. BORKAR, J.) (M. S. KARNIK, J.) Writ Petition No. 6805 of 2023 decided on 30.06.2023 ZIP