Mallika Vishnoo Chainani v. State Of Maharashtra Thru. Secretary And ORS

9-wp-8480-2025.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 8480 OF 2025 Mallika Vishnoo Chairnani ...

Petitioner V/s.

State of Maharashtra through Secretary and Ors.

...

Respondents ------------------- Mr. Swaraj Jadhav with Prakash Nichani, Vikas Kumbhar and Shreya Karhade, for the petitioner.

Mr. N.N. Bhadrashete with Viresh Bhadrashete, Kavisha Shah and Hrutvik Patil, i/by India Law Alliance, for the respondent nos. 4 to 7. Mr. P.V. Nelson Rajan, AGP, for the respondent nos. 1 to 3. --------------------

CORAM

:

N.J. JAMADAR, J.

DATE :

1st AUGUST 2025 SWAROOP SHARAD PHADKE SWAROOP SHARAD PHADKE Date: 2025.08.03 12:12:20 +0530 PC:

1.

Heard the learned counsel for the parties.

2.

When the Court expressed its disinclination to entertain the petition as the petitioner has an efficacious statutory remedy, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the petition with liberty to file an appropriate proceeding before the State Government.

3.

Leave granted with liberty as prayed for.

varsha

9-wp-8480-2025.doc 4.

The Petition stands disposed as withdrawn.

5.

In the event the petitioner files the revision application within a period of four weeks from today, the State Government shall decide the same as expeditiously as possible.

6.

In case the question of limitation arises, the time spent by the petitioner in prosecuting this petition may be accounted for under Section 14 of the Limitation Act.

(N.J. JAMADAR, J) varsha