← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/8581/2025disposed off

M/S. Laboratoires Griffon Pvt Ltd Through Pranit Lopes v. Zulekha Usman Gani Patrawala And ORS

2025-07-08Hon'Ble Shri Justice N. J. Jamadar2 pages

16-wp-8581-2025.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 8581 OF 2025 M/s. Laboratories Griffon Pvt. Ltd through Pranit Lopes ...

Petitioner V/s.

Zulekha Usman Gani Patrawala and Ors.

...

Respondents ------------------- Mr. Mayur Khandeparkar a/w Amit Patil and Rishabh Jadhav i/by Parinam Law Associates, for the petitioner.

Mr. Prajot H. Jaggi with Daksha Parmar, Pallavi Kulkarni and Poonam Rajbhar, for respondent nos. 1, 2, 4 to 13, 16, 17, 18 and 21. -------------------- VARSHA DEEPAK GAIKWAD

CORAM

:

N.J. JAMADAR, J.

VARSHA DEEPAK GAIKWAD Date: 2025.07.10 10:43:03 +0530 DATE :

8th JULY 2025 PC:

1.

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2.

On 27th June 2025, this Court had permitted the respondent to place on record the terms on which the plaintiff, its employees, agents and customers would be allowed to have ingress to, and egress from, the suit property. The respondents have placed the said terms on the record of the Court on 3rd July 2025. The petitioner has filed the comments in relation to each of the terms.

3.

Prima facie it appears that the parties are at issue over most of the terms.

varsha

16-wp-8581-2025.doc 4.

Disputed questions of facts are raised.

5.

It may not be expedient for this Court to delve into these disputed questions of facts, as the Court at the first instance to do. 6.

The learned counsel for the respondents, on instructions, makes a statement that ingress to and egress from the leased premises would not be restrained by the respondents. The statement made on behalf of the respondents is accepted.

7.

The respondents are at liberty to file an affidavit-in-reply within a period of two weeks.

8.

Rejoinder, if any, within a period of two weeks thereafter. 9.

Stand over to 29th July 2025.

(N.J. JAMADAR, J) varsha