Vijayraghunath Salunke And ORS v. State Of Maharashtra Thru. G.P. And ORS

Digitally signed by DINESH SADANAND SHERLA Date:

2025.07.01 10:54:21 +0530 84-cwp-8691-25.doc DINESH SADANAND SHERLA

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 8691 OF 2025 Vijay R. Salunke & Ors.

... Petitioners V/s.

State of Maharashtra & Ors.

... Respondents ---------------- Adv. Yohaan Limathwala a/w. Adv. Rupale Savangikar i/b Adv. Omkar Kelkar for the Petitioners.

Ms Reena A. Salunkhe, AGP for the Respondent/State. Adv. Ismil Nashikwala for Respondent No.3 (through V.C.) ----------------

CORAM

:

M.S. KARNIK & N.R. BORKAR, J.J.

DATE :

30th JUNE, 2025.

P.C.

1.

Learned counsel for respondent No.3-HDFC fairly states that the possession of the secured assets will not be taken till the interim moratorium under Section 96 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 is in force. In this view of the matter, the petition is worked out for the present. 2.

The Petition is accordingly, disposed of.

3.

Liberty to apply at the appropriate stage.

(N.R. BORKAR, J.) (M.S. KARNIK, J.) DSS 1/1