Real Venture Investment Llp v. State Of Maharashtra Thr The Secretary Public Works Dept. And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.9440 OF 2025 Real Venture Investment LLP ...

Petitioner

Versus

State of Maharashtra and Others ...

Respondents ****** Mr. Hitesh Vyas a/w. Mr. Rasik Raut, for the Petitioner. Smt. M.S. Bane, AGP for Respondent Nos. 1 to 3. Mr. Lokesh Zade, for Respondent No. 4.

Mr. Vaibhav Salvi a/w. Mr. Ashwet Bhoir, for Respondent Nos. 5 to 9. Mr. Chetan Nagare a/w. Mr. Prasad Avhad, for Respondent No. 10. VISHAL SUBHASH PAREKAR VISHAL SUBHASH PAREKAR Date: 2026.04.23 12:22:14 +0530 ******

CORAM

: MANISH PITALE AND SHREERAM V. SHIRSAT, JJ.

DATE : 22nd APRIL, 2026 P.C. :

1.

In this petition, the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel representing respondent Nos. 5 to 9 submit that the dispute between the said parties has been settled as per the consent terms dated 22nd April, 2026. Learned counsel submits that on the basis of said consent terms, the Writ Petition can be disposed of.

2.

It is relevant to note that this Writ Petition arises out of an order dated 6th May, 2025 passed by the respondent No. 3- Sub Divisional Officer and competent authority. Perusal of the same shows that respondent Nos. 10 and ....1

11 were parties in the proceeding before respondent No. 3. 3.

Respondent No. 12 was not a party in the said proceeding. Nonetheless, the petitioner has added the said company as party. Respondent No. 10 is represented by learned counsel, upon whom copy of the consent terms is served today and he seeks short adjournment to take instructions in the matter.

4.

We also sought a clarification from the petitioner as to whether the consent terms executed between the petitioner and respondent Nos. 5 to 9, would in any manner trench upon the interests of respondent Nos. 10 to 12. In that light, we are inclined to adjourn the proceeding. 5.

At this stage, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this Court may consider dispensing with the personal presence of the partner of the petitioner and respondent Nos. 5 to 9 who are the parties to the consent terms on the next date of listing, as all of them are present in person today before this Court. It is further brought to the notice of this Court that respondent No. 6 is a cancer patient undergoing treatment and therefore it would be difficult for him to attend the Court proceeding on the next date. 6.

We have verified from the photocopies of the documents such as Aadhar cards and Pan cards annexed to the consent terms that the said parties ....2

are indeed present in Court today.

7.

In view of above, list this petition in the category of 'fresh matters' on 27th April, 2026.

8.

The presence of the parties to the consent terms is dispensed with for the next date of listing.

9.

The consent terms are returned to the learned counsel for the parties to be presented on the next date of listing. In the meanwhile, respondent No. 4 Corporation may file its reply affidavit on record. (SHREERAM V. SHIRSAT, J.) (MANISH PITALE, J.) ....3