Mustafa Ibrahim Shaikh v. The State Of Maharashtra Thr The Registrar And Dy Reg Of The Co Op Soc. And ORS
Santosh
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 7673 OF 2025 Benzir Sallauddin Khan WRIT PETITION NO. 9582 OF 2025 Rajeshri Rajkumar Berde WRIT PETITION NO. 9566 OF 2025 Rahan Ramjan Khan WRIT PETITION NO. 9587 OF 2025 SANTOSH SUBHASH KULKARNI Mustafa Ibrahim Shaikh by SANTOSH SUBHASH KULKARNI Date:
2025.08.02 16:45:41 +0530 WRIT PETITION NO. 9574 OF 2025 Ramjan Ajij Khan 1/4
WRIT PETITION NO. 9567 OF 2025 Sallauddin Ajij Khan WRIT PETITION NO. 9569 OF 2025 Sikandar Salauddin Khan WRIT PETITION NO. 9589 OF 2025 Gulab Ajij Khan WRIT PETITION NO. 9564 OF 2025 Radhika Rajkumar Berde WRIT PETITION NO. 9565 OF 2025 Tanvir Salauddin Khan WRIT PETITION NO. 9577 OF 2025 Rajiya Salluddin Khan 2/4
WRIT PETITION NO. 9590 OF 2025 Javed Akbar Khan Ms. Aishwarya Rane, for the Petitioner in all petitions. Mr. Uday Jaguste, for Respondent No.2 in all petitions. Mr. Suhas Deokar, a/w Mr. Tanmay Shembavnekar, for Respondent No.3 Smt. Savina Crasto, AGP for the State in WP/7673/2025, WP/9582/2025, WP/9564/2025, WP/9567/2025 and WP/9527/2025.
Smt. M. S. Srivastava, AGP for the State in WP/9590/2025 and WP/9566/2025.
Mr. P. V. Nelsonrajan, AGP for the State in WP/9587/2025 and WP/9574/2025.
Smt. S. D. Chipade, AGP for the State in WP/9589/2025.
CORAM:
N. J. JAMADAR, J.
DATED:
30th JULY, 2025 PC:- 1.
Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner. 2.
The challenge in these petitions is to the orders dated 21st February, 2025 passed by the Deputy Registrar, Co-operative Societies, thereby granting a certificate of recovery under Section 101 of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 ("the Act, 1960").
3.
The petitioners have an efficacious statutory remedy under Section 154 of the Act, 1960. No case for exercise of extraordinary writ jurisdiction despite the existence of statutory 3/4
remedy, especially in the face of the interdict contained in subsection 2A of Section 154, which mandates the person challenging the recovery certificate under Section 101 to deposit 50% of the total amount of recoverable dues, is made out. 4.
Hence, the petitions stand dismissed.
[N. J. JAMADAR, J.] 4/4