← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/9844/2025disposed off

Rohidas Vishnudas Totewad Thr Father And Natural Guardian Vishnudas Pandurang Totewad v. The State Of Maharashtra Through Secretary And Another

2025-08-07Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More , Hon'Ble Shri Justice Abasaheb D. Shinde2 pages

NISHA SANDEEP CHITNIS SANDEEP CHITNIS Date: 2025.07.24 16:10:09 +0530 10-wp.9844.2025.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.9844 OF 2025 Ulka Seafoods Pvt. Ltd.

Through its director Raju Gorakh Rohakale

...Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and Ors.

...Respondents

Ms. Samiksha J. Patil a/w Mr. Vijay Shinde i/b Shinde & Co., for the Petitioner.

Ms. Tanu N. Bhatia, A.G.P for the Respondent Nos.1 to 3-State. None for the Respondent Nos.4 to 8.

CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE & DR. NEELA GOKHALE, JJ.

DATE : 23rd JULY 2025 P.C. :

1.

At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to amend the prayer clause. Leave granted. Amendment to be carried out within one week from today and amended copy be served on the other side.

2.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

N. S. Chitnis 1/2

10-wp.9844.2025.doc 3.

Issue notice to the respondents, returnable on 26th August 2025. Learned A.G.P. waives notice on behalf of respondent Nos.1 to 3-State and seeks time to take instructions. Hamdast permitted. 4.

In addition to Court notice, learned counsel for the petitioner to serve the respondent Nos.4 to 8, by private notice and file affidavit of service before the next date. 5.

Learned Counsel for the petitioner to supply spare copies in the Registry, within one week from today, so as to enable the Registry to issue notices to the said respondents. 6.

Affidavit-in-replies, if any, to be filed in the Registry, before the next date and advance copy to be served on the other side. DR. NEELA GOKHALE, J.

REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.

N. S. Chitnis 2/2