Primevelkin Properties Llp v. The State Of Maharashtra Thr The Prin. Sec. Dept. Of Revenue And Forest And ORS

11-WP-10152-2025 (C).doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 10152 OF 2025 Primevelkin Properties LLP

...Petitioner

VERSUS

The State of Maharashtra Through The Prin. Sec. Dept. Of Revenue And Forest And Ors. ...Respondents ....

Ms. Manvi Sharma i/by Mr. Harshad Sathe, Advocate for the Petitioner.

Mr. N.C. Walimbe, Addl. Govt. Pleader a/w Mr. V. G. Badgujar, AGP for the Respondent - State.

....

CORAM

:

M. S. KARNIK & N. R. BORKAR, JJ.

DATE :

12thAUGUST, 2025 P.C.

:

1.

Heard the learned counsel for the Petitioner. 2.

The petitioner prays for a direction to the respondents to delete Mutation Entry No.5750 dated 10.04.2006 and to remove the acquisition remark "Acquired for Kasarsai Righ Bank Canal Distributaries Nos.7, 8, 9, and 10" from the 7/12 extracts pertaining to Survey Nos.40 and 41, Village Mann, Taluka Mulshi, District Pune. The petitioner prays further for a direction to the respondents to update the revenue records and 7/12 extracts accordingly.

ZIP

11-WP-10152-2025 (C).doc 3.

The grievance of the petitioner is that the petitioner is similarly situate as the petitioners in Writ Petition No.11917 of 2015, which was disposed of by this Court by order dated 27.04.2016 in the following terms :

"1.

The petitioners by these petitions have challenged the acquisition proceedings which were initiated by the Special Land Acquisition Officer.

2. The grievance of the petitioners is that through the acquisition proceedings had lapsed, the entries made in the Revenue record reserving the land for project affected persons have not been deleted. The Deputy Collector (Land Acquisition) No.22, Pune has filed affidavit in reply. He has stated in the reply that since the acquisition proceedings initiated by respondent No.3 could not be completed, the same have lapsed. In view of this affidavit in reply, there is no manner of doubt that the acquisition proceedings in respect of the said land have lapsed and a formal notification to that effect is remained to be issued. We, therefore, direct respondent No.2 to direct his officials to delete the entries of reservation from the Revenue record of the land owned by the petitioners as expeditiously as possible and in any case within a period of 6 weeks from today. The Petitions are accordingly disposed of in the aforesaid terms."

4.

We direct the revenue authorities to examine the grievance of the petitioner and consider deleting the entries of reservation from the revenue record of the land owned by the petitioner as expeditiously as possible and in any case within a period of six weeks from the date of making an application to that effect.

5.

The petition is disposed of.

(N. R. BORKAR, J.) (M. S. KARNIK, J.) ZIP