← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/10300/2025allowed to be withdrawn

Aarti Mahesh Barman v. State Of Maharashtra Thro. The Ld. Govt. Pleade

2025-11-12Hon'Ble Shri Justice A.S. Gadkari , Hon'Ble Shri Justice Shyam C. Chandak2 pages

49 AND 50 WP 10300 OF 2025.DOC

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 10300 OF 2025 (SERIAL NO. 49) Aarti Mahesh Barman

...Petitioner

Versus

State of Maharashtra Thro. The LD. Govt.

Pleader

...Respondent

ALONGWITH WRIT PETITION NO. 10302 OF 2025 (SERIAL NO. 50) Farida Kadeer Shaikh

...Petitioner

Versus

State of Maharashtra Thro. The LD. Govt.

Pleader

...Respondents

Mr Sandeep D. Sherkhane, for the Petitioners. Mrs. Tejaswi Nanche i/by Adv. Medha Rane, for the Respondent No. 02-Vinod Mahila.

Mr S. P. Kamble AGP, for the Respondent-State in WP 10302 of 2025.

Mr A. K. Naik, AGP, for the Respondent-State in WP 10300 of 2025.

CORAM:

SUMAN SHYAM & S. M. MODAK, JJ.

DATED:

12th NOVEMBER 2025.

PC:- 1.

It is submitted at the bar that despite sincere efforts made on behalf of the Petitioners, the Bank has not yet furnished the repayment schedule as observed in the order dated 03.10.2025 by SEEMA KSHITIJ YELKAR Date:

2025.11.15 11:33:40 +0530 SEEMA KSHITIJ YELKAR Seema 12th November 2025

49 AND 50 WP 10300 OF 2025.DOC passed by this Court. Taking note of the fact that the Petitioner is woman entrepreneur, who had suffered heavy financial losses due to unexpected outbreak of Covid-19 pandemic and in view of the fact she is willing to repay the loan provided a soft repayment option is permitted by Bank, we, on the request of Ms. learned Advocate for the Respondent-Bank grant time to the Bank till 5th December 2025 to come up with a repayment proposal which is practicable in the facts of this case.

2.

We make it clear that although in these matters, the Writ Court would not ordinarily interfere in exercise of the jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of the India, yet having regard to the peculiar facts and circumstance of the case, the meagre amount of loan availed by the Petitioner and also considering the social status of the Petitioner, for the ends of justice we are inclined to adopt a humane approach in this matter in exercise of our discretionary jurisdiction and pass necessary orders. 3.

List these matters again on 05th December 2025. (S. M. MODAK, J.) (SUMAN SHYAM, J.) { Seema 12th November 2025