Avinash Bharat Pawar And ANR v. The South Indian Bank Ltd And ANR

908 WP 10744-25-C.DOC Priya Soparkar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 10744 of 2025 Avinash Bharat Pawar and anr.

...Petitioners

Versus

The South Indian Bank Limited and ors.

...Respondents

Mr. Kapil P. Shetye, for the Petitioners.

Mr. Harsh Nishar i/by Mr. Amey Deshpande, for the Respondent No.3.

Ms. Sudha Kaloti (through V.C.), for the Respondent No.7.

CORAM:

SUMAN SHYAM & SHYAM C. CHANDAK, JJ.

DATED:

22ND AUGUST, 2025.

PC:- 1.

Contending that there is some discrepancy in the order dated 6th August, 2025 passed by this Court, Mr. Kapil P. Shetye, learned counsel for the Petitioners has pointed out the specific directions contained in paragraph Nos.3 and 5 of the order dated 6th August, 2025, to submit that due to some confusion, his clients were unable to deposit the sum of Rs.90,000/- in the Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal (DRAT) as per the directions of this Court. Petitioners' counsel seeks extension of one week time from today to comply with the said direction.

Digitally signed by PRIYA RAJESH SOPARKAR Date:

2025.08.22 18:37:50 +0530 PRIYA RAJESH SOPARKAR 22nd August, 2025.

908 WP 10744-25-C.DOC 2.

After going through the order dated 6th August, 2025, we find that the observations in paragraph Nos.3 and 5 present slightly divergent observations, which could have created some confusion for the Petitioners. Therefore, for the ends of justice, we grant extension of time till 4th September, 2025 to the Petitioners to deposit the amount as per the order dated 6th August, 2025. 3.

List the matter again on 4th September, 2025. (SHYAM C. CHANDAK, J.) (SUMAN SHYAM, J.) { 22nd August, 2025.