Godrej And Boyce Manufacturing Company Ltd v. The Collector Mumbai Suburban District And ORS

504-WP 12027-25.DOC Digitally signed by PRAJAKTA SAGAR VARTAK Date:

2025.10.09 11:01:11 +0530 PRAJAKTA SAGAR VARTAK Prajakta Vartak

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 12027 OF 2025 Godrej & Boyce Manufacturing Company Ltd.

...Petitioner

Vs The Collector, Mumbai Suburban District & Ors.

...Respondents

_________ Mr. Vineet Naik, Senior Counsel with Mr. Bhushan Deshmukh i/b. Bachubhai Munim & Co. for Petitioner.

Dr. Dhruti Kapadia, AGP for State.

Mr. Anil Singh, ASG with Mr. Prakash Pandey, Mr. Adarsh Vyas and Ms. Dhruvi Patni for Respondent No.3.

__________

CORAM:

G. S. KULKARNI & AARTI SATHE, JJ.

DATE:

08 OCTOBER 2025.

P.C.

1.

Not on board. Taken on board on a praecipe moved on behalf of the petitioner.

2.

Reply affidavit on behalf of Union of India is already filed. 3.

Dr. Kapadia, learned AGP states that the State is in the process of filing its reply affidavit. She seeks some further time to file reply affidavit. We extend the time for a period of three weeks. Let the reply affidavit be served on the advocate for the petitioner and the other respondents. 4.

Permission to learned advocate for the petitioner to file rejoinder affidavit to the reply affidavit filed on behalf of Union of India. 5.

List the proceedings for admission on 11 November 2025 (H.O.B.). 6.

Ad-interim order, if any passed earlier, shall continue to operate till the adjourned date of hearing.

(AARTI SATHE, J.) (G. S. KULKARNI, J.) 08 October 2025