Godrej And Boyce Manufacturing Company Ltd v. The Collector Mumbai Suburban District And ORS

502-WP-12027-25.DOC

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

JYOTI RAJESH MANE CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION by JYOTI RAJESH MANE Date: 2025.11.26 18:04:57 +0530 WRIT PETITION NO. 12027 OF 2025 Godrej & Boyce Manufacturing Company Limited

...Petitioners

Versus

The Collector, Mumbai Suburban District & Ors.

...Respondents

_______ Mr. Vineet Naik, Senior Counsel with Mr. Bhushan Deshmukh, i/b. Bachubhai Munim & Co. for Petitioner.

Dr. Dhruti Kapadia, AGP for Respondent/State. Ms. Dhruti Patini, for Respondent No.3.

_______

CORAM:

G. S. KULKARNI & AARTI SATHE, JJ.

DATE:

24th NOVEMBER 2025 P.C.

1.

Not on board. Taken on board on a praecipe as moved on behalf of the Petitioner.

2.

We have perused the order dated 8th October 2025. We are informed by Dr. Dhruti Kapadia, AGP for State that the reply affidavit is already filed. Copy of the same is stated to have been served.

3.

Mr. Vineet Naik learned Senior Advocate for the Petitioner states that the rejoinder is intended to be filed. We permit the Petitioners to place on record the rejoinder affidavit.

Mane

502-WP-12027-25.DOC 4.

List the Petition on 15th December 2025.

5.

Ad-interim orders, if any passed earlier, shall continue to operate till the adjourned date of hearing.

6.

We clarify that the order dated 8th October 2025 does not, in any manner, operate as a stay on the pending Reference filed by the Petitioner. The hearing of the Reference, as well as any interim applications arising thereunder, shall proceed accordingly.

(AARTI SATHE, J.) (G. S. KULKARNI, J.) Mane