Rupali Nitin Paigude And ORS v. The Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal Thr The President And ORS

905.WP.12125.2023.doc Ajay IN IN THE THE HIGH HIGH COURT COURT OF OF JUDICATURE JUDICATURE AT AT BOMBAY BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 12125 OF 2025 Rupali Nitin Paigude and Ors.

.. Petitioners

Versus

The Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal, Pune and Ors.

.. Respondents ....................

 Mr. Anirban Tripathy, Advocate i/by Bhakti Godhamgaonkar for Petitioners.

 Mr. Bapusaheb Dahiphale, AGP for Respondent Nos.1 and 2 - State.  Mr. Siddharth Wakankar a/w. Mr. Viraj Hate, Advocates for Respondents - Caveators.

....................

CORAM

: MILIND N. JADHAV, J.

DATE : SEPTEMBER 25, 2025.

P.C.:

1.

Heard Mr. Tripathy, learned Advocate for Petitioners; Mr. Dahiphale, learned Advocate for Respondent Nos.1 and 2 - State and Mr. Wakankar, learned Advocate for Respondents / Caveators. 2.

The issue which has been remanded by the Sub-Divisional Officer (SDO) to the Tahasildar for the purpose of taking evidence and adjudicating the matter by virtue of the order is directed to be adjudicated as expeditiously as possible and in any event within a period of eight (8) weeks from today keeping all contentions of both parties is expressly open.

905.WP.12125.2023.doc 3.

Needless to state that Tahasildar shall take appropriate evidence as per the directions given by the SDO and pass a speaking order after hearing both sides in accordance with law. 4.

In view of the above, nothing survives in the Writ Petition. Writ Petition is disposed.

[ MILIND N. JADHAV, J. ] Ajay AJAY TRAMBAK UGALMUGALE Date: 2025.09.25 14:54:06 +0530 AJAY TRAMBAK UGALMUGALE