Ratan A. Bhalwal And ORS v. Addl. Registrar Patsanstha Co Op. Soc. And ORS
11 WP 12584 OF 2025.DOC
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 12584 OF 2025 Ratan A. Bhalwal (Ex - Chairman) and Ors.
...Petitioners
Versus
Additional Registrar (Patsanstha) Co.-op.
Societies, Maharashtra State, Pune and Ors.
...Respondents
Mr. Mayur Khandeparkar a/w. S. A. Bhalwaland and Usha Sing i/b. M/s. Vyas & Bhalwal Vyas & Bhalwal, Advocate for the Petitioners.
Mrs. T. N. Bhatia, AGP for the State - Respondent Nos. 1 and 5.
CORAM:
SUMAN SHYAM & MANJUSHA DESHPANDE, JJ.
DATED:
16TH OCTOBER 2025.
PC:- 1.
In this Writ Petition, the primary grievance expressed by the Petitioners is on account of delay in disposal of the Appeal preferred under Section 152 of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 (hereinafter referred to as, "the Act of 1960", for short) before the Departmental Minister (Minister of Co - operation, Mantralaya, Mumbai) against the report dated 6th February, 2025. Mr. Mayur Khandeparkar, learned counsel appearing for the Petitioners submits that being aggrieved by the report dated 6th February, 2025, the Petitioners have preferred a statutory Appeal under Section 152 of the Act of 1960 along with Digitally signed by RAJESHRI PRAKASH AHER Date:
2025.10.17 16:19:26 +0530 the stay application, which is still pending disposal. In the RAJESHRI PRAKASH AHER meantime, demand notice dated 10th July, 2025 has been issued so 16th October 2025 Rajeshri Aher
11 WP 12584 OF 2025.DOC as to implement the report dated 6th February, 2025. The learned counsel submits that if the demand notice is implemented during the pendency of the Statutory Appeal then in that case, the same would not only rendered the Appeal infructuous, but also cause serious prejudice to the interest of his client. Hence, a direction has been sought from this Court.
2.
Mrs. T. N. Bhatia, learned AGP appearing for the Respondent-State submits on instructions that within four months from today, the statutory Appeal preferred by the Petitioners shall be disposed of by reasoned order. The Petitioners are also agreeable to the same. If that be so, nothing further survives for adjudication in the Writ Petition.
3.
The Appeal preferred by the Petitioners be disposed of within four months from the date of this order. Till such time, the Appeal is disposed of by a reasoned order, the implementation/execution of the demand notice dated 10th July, 2025, shall be kept in abeyance.
4.
Writ Petition stands disposed of.
(MANJUSHA DESHPANDE, J.) (SUMAN SHYAM, J.) { 16th October 2025 Rajeshri Aher