Anil Ganjidhar Pawar v. Prashant Satish Shewale And Others
TRUPTI SADANAND BAMNE Digitally signed by TRUPTI SADANAND BAMNE Date:
2025.09.29 20:08:06 +0530 TRUPTI SADANAND BAMNE TRUPTI SADANAND BAMNE Date: 2025.10.01 11:23:39 +0530
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 12672 OF 2025 Sudam Raghu Ombale & Ors.
... Petitioners versus The State of Maharashtra & Ors.
... Respondents ...
Mr.Sandeep B. Sontakke for the Petitioners.
Mr.A.I.Patel, Addl.GP with Ms.D.S.Deshmukh, AGP for the RespondentState. Mr.Ashwin R. Kapadnis for Respondent Nos. 2 and 3, Zilla Parishad, Pune. ...
CORAM :
RAVINDRA V. GHUGE & ASHWIN D. BHOBE, JJ.
DATE : 29th September, 2025 P.C.:- 1.
In this Petition, the Petitioners are District Awardee Teachers, who have been granted such awards prior to 04.09.2018. 2.
The Petitioners have put forth prayer clauses (B) and (C), as under :- "B) By issuing writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction in like nature. The respondent No. 2 may be directed 1/6
to grant the benefit of one additional increment to the petitioners for "District Teacher Award" and arrears from the date of award till the orders of the Court, in view of circular dated 12/12/2000.
C) To grant any other Suitable relief in favour of the petitioners and entitled by them as per the law".
3.
The learned Advocate for the Petitioners points out that in identical set of circumstances, the Petitioners were granted the benefits, which were subsequently taken away by the State Government vide the Government Resolution dated 04.09.2018. The aggrieved Petitioners approached the High Court which restored their benefits. The Nashik Zilla Parishad approached the Honourable Supreme Court in Petition for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No. 19730/2021. By order dated 13.04.2022, the SLP was dismissed by concluding that the district awardees were entitled to the additional increment, if granted prior to 04.09.2018 and no error has been committed by the High Court in directing the payment of the additional increment.
4.
The issue was considered by the Division Bench of this Court at the Principal Seat in Writ Petition (Stamp) No.3501/2021, filed by Laxman Pandurang Nikam and others vs. The State of Maharashtra and 2/6
others and a group of Petitions. It was concluded in paragraphs 2 to 8 as under :- "2. Heard. The learned counsel for the Petitioners submits that the Petitioners in these Writ Petitions are the District Awardee Teachers prior to 04.09.2018.
3. For the first time, additional increment was given to the District Awardee Teachers under the Government Resolution dated 12.12.2000. Pursuant thereto, additional increments as per the said Govt. Resolution were given.
4. There are other categories of awardee teachers such as State Awardee Teachers, National Awardee Teachers and the award being given for excellent outstanding work. In the present case, we are concerned only with the District Awardee Teachers.
5. Upon perusal of various Govt. Resolution placed on record, it does not appear that prior to the Govt. Resolution dated 04.09.2018, there was any Govt. Resolution taking away benefit of the additional increment given to District Awardee Teachers. Of course, now, no District Awardee Teacher would be entitled for the benefit in view of the Govt. Resolution dated 04.09.2018. However, Govt. Resolution dated 04.09.2018 cannot be given retrospective effect.
6. Govt. Resolution relied by the learned counsel for Zilla Parishad viz. Govt. Resolution dated 27.02.2009 is general in nature. It only states that the committee formed by the Govt. has made recommendation and the same is to be accepted with certain modifications. Under the Govt. Resolution dated 24.08.2017, Govt. has taken decision that the benefit of advance increment would not be available to those who were granted certificate of excellent work. It is under the Govt. Resolution dated 04.09.2018 now the benefit of 3/6
additional increment to the District Awardee Teacher can not be given.
7. However, all those who were granted certificate of District Awardee Teacher prior to 04.09.2018 cannot be denied the said benefit of additional increment.
8. In light of the above, we pass the following order: a. The Respondent / Zilla Parisahd after confirming themselves of the Petitioners being District Awardee Teachers and awarded certificate prior to 04.09.2018 shall individually consider the case of the Petitioners for additional increment as is laid down under the Government Resolution dated 12.12.2000. The same shall be considered expeditiously preferably within a period of six months and the Respondents shall communicate their decision to the Petitioner, in writing. on its own merits expeditiously preferably within a period of six months and the Respondents shall communicate their decision to the Petitioner, in writing.
b. At the request of the learned counsel for the Petitioner in Writ Petition (ST) No.18924/2018, all office objections are dispensed with, except Court Fees.
c. All Writ Petitions stand disposed of accordingly."
5.
Identical orders were passed with relation to several other Zilla Parishads, out of which, the Chief Executive Officer, Zilla Parishad, Nashik, had approached the Honourable Supreme Court in Petition for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No.19730/2021. Vide order dated 13.04.2022, it was held as under :- 4/6
"It is not in dispute that, prior to 04.09.2018, the District Awardees were entitled to get the additional increment. It was only pursuant to the Circular dated 04.09.2018, the District Awardees were not entitled to get the additional increment. Therefore, for the period prior to 04.09.2018, the District Awardees were entitled to get the additional increment and therefore, no error has been committed by the High Court in directing the benefit of additional increment to the District Awardees for the period prior to 04.09.2018.
We are in complete agreement with the view taken by the High Court The Special Leave Petition stands dismissed.
Pending applications stand disposed of."
6.
The learned Addl.GP submits that Review Petitions have been filed by the Zilla Parishads. This statement is confirmed by the learned Advocates representing the respective Zilla Parishads. 7.
Having considered the order of the Honourable Supreme Court reproduced above, we do not find that the pendency of the Review Petitions could be an impediment for considering this Petition. The order of the Honourable Supreme Court is a speaking order. 8.
In the light of the above, this Writ Petition is partly allowed with the direction to the Zilla Parishad/concerned Authorities to confirm 5/6
that the Petitioners are the District Awardee Teachers, who has been awarded such certificates prior to 04.09.2018. After verifying this aspect, they would proceed to grant additional increments as is laid down in the circular dated 12.12.2000 to the Petitioners. Let such exercise of verification and payment be made, within 90 days. (ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.) (RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.) 6/6