Pradeep Prahlad Kharat v. Surekha Prahlad Kharat

54-wp-12955-2025.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 12955 OF 2025 Pradeep Prahlad Kharat ...

Petitioner V/s.

Surekha Prahlad Kharat ...

Respondent ------------------- Mr. Lalasaheb Bandal, for the petitioner.

--------------------

CORAM

:

N.J. JAMADAR, J.

DATE :

6TH OCTOBER 2025.

PC:

Digitally signed by VARSHA DEEPAK GAIKWAD Date:

2025.10.08 10:40:15 +0530 VARSHA DEEPAK GAIKWAD 1.

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. 2.

The petitioner has an efficacious remedy of filing an appeal before the Appellate Authority under Section 16 of the Senior Citizens Act, 2007. (Jagdish Pitamber Pawar vs. Pitamber Pundalik Pawar and Ors"1).

3.

Reserving the liberty to prefer an appeal against the impugned order, the petition stands disposed.

4.

The time spent by the petitioner in prosecuting this petition may be accounted for under Section 14 of the Limitation Act in the event the question of limitation for filing an appeal arises for consideration. (N.J. JAMADAR, J) W.P. 36 of 2023 of Bombay H.C. at A'bad bench. varsha