Revati Niwas Cooperative Housing Society Ltd v. The State Of Maharshtra Thr The Goverment Pleader And ORS

3-wp 13100-25.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 13100 OF 2025 Revati Niwas Co-operative Housing Society Ltd. ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra & Anr.

... Respondents __________________________ Ms. Vedashree Phadake a/w. Mr. Raj Chaurasia i/b Mr. Pranil Sonawane for the Petitioner.

Ms. Anushka Rane for the Intervenor.

Mr. Kedar B. Dighe, Addl GP a/w. Smt. Ashwini A. Purav, AGP for the Respondent-State.

__________________________

CORAM

: M. S. KARNIK AND S. M. MODAK, JJ.

DATED : 8 th JANUARY, 2026.

P.C. :

1.

Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner.

2.

The Petitioner prays for the following reliefs: - "(a) The Hon'ble Court be pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus thereby to issue directions against the Respondent No.2-Assistant Registrar, Co-operative Housing Society, Bhiwandi, Thane to forthwith consider and take necessary action upon the application dated 13.09.2024 submitted by the Petitioner, for seeking permission to rectify the typographical error in Form 'Z', in accordance with law." 3.

The application made by the Petitioner is pending before Respondent No.2. We have heard learned counsel for the Petitioner. Learned counsel for the Intervener appeared and sought time to file an application for intervention.

Amk 1/2

3-wp 13100-25.doc 4.

An attempt was made by the learned counsel for the Intervener to oppose this Petition by contending that the claim made by the Petitioner is not justified and that the application dated 13th September, 2024 is not bonafide. As of today, there is no Intervention Application on record. In any case and upon hearing the learned counsel for the Petitioner, we are inclined to direct the Respondent No.2 to consider the application dated 13th September, 2024 on its own merits and in accordance with law and take the same to its logical conclusion by taking a decision thereon as expeditiously as possible and preferably within a period of 16 weeks from the date of communication of this Order.

5.

It is open for the Intervener to oppose the application dated 13th September, 2024 made before Respondent No.2. If the application is opposed by the Intervener, the objections raised may be considered by Respondent No.2 while deciding the application. 6.

With such aforesaid observations, the Petition is disposed of. 7.

Learned counsel for the Petitioner as well as Intervener submitted that they will appear before Respondent No.2 along with copy of this Order on 19th January, 2026 at 11.00 a.m. The Petitioner as well as learned counsel for the Intervener to co-operate with Respondent No.2. (S. M. MODAK, J.) (M. S. KARNIK, J.) Amk 2/2