Mamta Aarav Tak v. The Addl. District Collector Thane

905-WP13512-2025.DOC Santosh

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 13512 OF 2025 Mamta Aarav Tak

...Petitioner

Versus

The Addl. District Collector, Thane, Appellate Authority and ors.

...Respondents

Mr. Hansraj Solanki, for the Petitioner.

Ms. D. S. Deshmukh, AGP for Respondent No.1.

Mr. Vishal Salvi, a/w Tejas Pawar and Suchitra Kamble, for the Respondent Nos.2 and 3.

CORAM:

N. J. JAMADAR, J.

DATED:

14th OCTOBER, 2025 PC:- 1.

Heard the learned Counsel for the parties.

2.

The learned Counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, seeks leave to withdraw the petition.

SANTOSH SUBHASH KULKARNI 3.

The learned Counsel, however, submits that the petitioner by SANTOSH SUBHASH KULKARNI Date: 2025.10.16 11:08:25 +0530 be provided one month's time to vacate the subject premises. 4.

The petition stands disposed as withdrawn.

5.

The statement made on behalf of the petitioner that, the petitioner will vacate the premises, within a period of one month, is recorded.

1/2

905-WP13512-2025.DOC 6.

The petitioner shall vacate the premises on or before 14th November, 2025.

7.

In the meanwhile, the execution and operation of the impugned order shall remain stayed.

8.

In the event, the petitioner does not vacate the premises on or before 14th November, 2025, the Authorities shall be at liberty to execute the impugned order in accordance with law. [N. J. JAMADAR, J.] 2/2