Sanskruti Sudhir Patil v. Pimpri Chinchwad College Of Engineering Thr Its Chairman And ORS

by MULEY SHUBHAM PRAVINRAO Date:

2026.03.07 20:50:58 +0530 MULEY SHUBHAM PRAVINRAO 1 904-WP-13517-2025.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 13517 OF 2025 Sanskruti Sudhir Patil

...Petitioner

Vs.

Pimpri Chinchwad College of Engineering through its Chairman & Ors.

...Respondents

----------------- Adv. Chaitrali Deshmukh i/by Satyajeet Rajeshirake for the Petitioner. Adv. S.V. Gavand a/w Pandurang Gaikwad for Respondent No.1. Adv. Meghna Gowalani for Respondent No.2.

----------------- CORAM : R. I. CHAGLA AND ADVAIT M. SETHNA, JJ.

DATED : 05TH MARCH, 2026 P.C.:- 1.

This Writ Petition has been placed pursuant to the amendment being carried out by the Petitioner in the Writ Petition. In amended paragraph 11(C) the Petitioner has stated that at the time of admission on 17 August 2025, the only original document not submitted was the caste validity certificate. For this document, Respondent No.1-college accepted a written undertaking from the Petitioner committing to submit the same within a stipulated period of six months. It is further stated in amended paragraph 11(N) that the Petitioner had accompanied by family members visited the Respondent No.1-college. Following the visit, Respondent No.1-college on 29 September 2025 sent a further communication to Respondent No.2-State 1/3

2 904-WP-13517-2025.doc CET Cell. It is stated that the said communication was prejudicial to the Petitioner's case as it inter alia failed to disclose the correct and complete facts, including the timely physical submission of the Non Creamy Layer certificate on 17 August 2025 and the family's repeated in person requests. 2.

The learned counsel appearing for the Respondent No.1-college states that there are no seats available to admit the Petitioner. This is supported by learned counsel appearing for Respondent No.2-State CET Cell. 3.

The Petitioner has identified in her additional affidavit one case of Mr. Pise Yash Sunil whose admission had been cancelled and thereafter restored on 12 September 2025. She has submitted that the Petitioner had requested for restoration of the admission on 10 September 2025 and the restoration application ought to have been considered in the same manner as it had to be considered for Mr. Pise Yash Sunil. 4.

The Petitioner shall file a further additional affidavit in order to clarify her stand on the submission of Creamy Layer Certificate with the Respondent No.1-college on 17 August 2025 and whether the written undertaking from the Petitioner committing to submit the caste validity certificate within the stipulated period of six months has been complied with. The further additional affidavit shall be filed by the Petitioner within a period of two weeks from today.

5.

Respondent No.2-State CET Cell and Respondent No.1-college shall file their affidavit in response to the further additional affidavit as well as 2/3

3 904-WP-13517-2025.doc the additional affidavit which has been filed by the Petitioner within a period of one week thereafter.

6.

Place the Writ Petition for consideration on 30 March 2026. [ADVAIT M. SETHNA, J.] [R.I. CHAGLA, J.] 3/3