← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/13974/2025allowed

Nishant Navnath Kekan v. The State Of Maharashtra And ORS

2025-11-06Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sandesh Dadasaheb Patil , Hon'Ble Justice Revati Mohite Dere4 pages

Digitally signed by SHAGUFTA QUTBUDDIN PATHAN Date:

2025.11.07 12:41:49 +0530 SHAGUFTA QUTBUDDIN PATHAN

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.13974 OF 2025 Nishant Navnath Kekan ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra & Anr.

... Respondents Ms. A. P. Madhuri a/w Mr. Tanmay Mishra and Mr. Gaurang Pendurkar for the Petitioner Mrs. M. S. Bane, A.G.P for the Respondents-State CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE & SANDESH D. PATIL, JJ.

THURSDAY, 6 th NOVEMBER 2025 P.C :

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

By this petition, the petitioner seeks a direction to the respondent No.2 to release the petitioner's vehicle, which is an ambulance bearing Registration No. MH-46-AH-7272. Perused the petition. It appears that the petitioner has been providing ambulance services in Raigad since 2016. It 1/4

further appears that the petitioner's vehicle i.e. the ambulance bearing Registration No.MH-46-AH-7272, came to be seized by the R.T.O, Andheri, Mumbai, as it was found plying contrary to the judgments of this Court.

It is not in dispute that the Division Bench of this Court, on 3rd March 2004, in Writ Petition No. 1762/2009, issued a direction to phase out eight-year-old transport vehicles from the city of Mumbai, unless the same were converted to run either on CNG or LPG. A direction was also issued in the said order that if, in breach of the direction, any vehicle was found plying within the limits of Mumbai, the same shall be immediately impounded by the Regional Transport Office or by the traffic police. Admittedly, the petitioner's vehicle is more than 8 years old and was found plying within the city limits of Mumbai.

Learned counsel for the petitioner has tendered an 2/4

undertaking of the petitioner dated 3rd November 2025. In the said undertaking, the petitioner has undertaken to this Court not to ply the vehicle within the local limits of Mumbai and that he would ply the vehicle only outside the city limits. The said affidavit-cum-undertaking is accepted as an undertaking to this Court.

In view of the aforesaid, we deem it appropriate to direct the release of the petitioner's vehicle bearing registration No.MH-46-AH-7272, subject to the condition that the petitioner deposits a sum of Rs.5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand only) with the concerned Regional Transport Office.

The said vehicle to be released on the petitioner producing receipt of such payment.

Petition is accordingly allowed and disposed of on the aforesaid terms.

3/4

All concerned to act on the authenticated copy of this Order.

SANDESH D. PATIL, J.

REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.

4/4