Mrudula Sanjayrao Shamraj Through Gurdian Sanjayrao Durgadasrao Shamraj v. The District Caste Scrutiny Committee Through Its Member Secretary And Others

2026:BHC-AUG:16195-DB (1)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 14280 OF 2025 MRUDULA SANJAYRAO SHAMRAJ THROUGH GURDIAN SANJAYRAO DURGADASRAO SHAMRAJ

VERSUS

THE DISTRICT CASTE SCRUTINY COMMITTEE THROUGH ITS MEMBER SECRETARY AND OTHERS ...

Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. Sanket S. Kulkarni AGP for Respondent/State: Mr. P. S. Patil ...

CORAM :

SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE AND ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, JJ.

DATED : APRIL 15, 2026 FINAL ORDER (PER ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, J):- 1.

By this Writ Petition, the petitioner takes an exception to the order dated 03.07.2025 passed by respondent No.2/Scrutiny Committee, by which the tribe claim of the petitioner of belonging to "Bhope" Nomadic Tribe has been dismissed for non prosecution. 2.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that due to some unavoidable circumstances, the petitioner could not keep track of the proceedings nor the petitioner at any point of time received the show cause notices issued by the respondent/Scrutiny Committee. The Scrutiny Committee has observed that despite several show-cause notices issued to the petitioner, he remained absent and thus, the petitioner is not interested to pursue the tribe claim. He submits that the impugned order is erroneous and therefore, the same is liable to

(2) be quashed and set-aside.

3.

Per contra, the learned A.G.P. submits that the order itself depicts that the respondent/Scrutiny committee has issued several show-cause notices to the petitioner. However, the petitioner was not diligent in pursuing his tribe claim. He therefore, urged that the respondent/Scrutiny Committee has rightly passed the impugned order thereby dismissing the tribe claim of the petitioner for nonprosecution. 4.

After hearing learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned AGP, we find that the impugned order depicts that several show-cause notices were issued to the petitioner and still the petitioner did not bother to pursue his tribe claim. Be that as it may, since the matter pertains to social status of the petitioner, we find it expedient in the interest of justice to permit the petitioner to pursue his tribe claim on merits.

5.

In that view of the matter, we are inclined to allow this Writ Petition. Hence, we pass following order :

ORDER

(I) The Writ Petition is allowed.

(II) The impugned order dated 03.07.2025 passed by the respondent/Scrutiny Committee thereby rejecting the tribe claim of the petitioner for non-prosecution is hereby quashed and set-aside.

(3) (III) The tribe claim of the petitioner shall stand restored to its original position.

(IV) We direct the petitioner to appear before the respondent/ Scrutiny Committee on 27.04.2026 and shall extend fullcooperation in expeditious decision of his tribe claim. (ABASAHEB D. SHINDE) (SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE) JUDGE JUDGE YSK/