Narmadabai Govind Jamdhade And Others v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

31-ASWP-15334-2025.DOC Priya Soparkar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 15334 OF 2025 Milind P. Tambe & Ors.

...Petitioners

Versus

Santosh D. Jadhav & Ors.

...Respondents

Mr. Anilkumar Patil, with Mr. Zeel Jain and Mr. Ashishraj Mane, i/b Mr. Digvijay A Patil, for the Petitioners.

Mr. P. G. Sawant, AGP, for Respondent No.8-State. Mr. Sandeep R. Waghmare, for Respondents Nos. 1 to 4. Mr. Sujit B. Padarat, for Respondent No. 7.

Mr Balaji Waghmare-Patil, OSD to Hon'ble Minister, present.

CORAM:

SUMAN SHYAM & M. M. SATHAYE, JJ.

DATED:

19th NOVEMBER, 2025.

PC:- 1.

Assailing the judgment and order dated 20th May, 2025 passed by the Deputy Registrar-Respondent No. 6, the Petitioners have preferred Revision Application before the State of Maharashtra on 25th June, 2025.

2.

The grievance of the Petitioners is on account of delay in hearing of the Petition.

3.

Mr. P. G. Sawant, learned AGP appearing for the Respondent No.8/State submits, on instructions, obtained from her client that the Revision Application submitted by the Petitioners will be Digitally signed by PRIYA RAJESH SOPARKAR Date:

2025.11.20 10:23:47 +0530 PRIYA RAJESH SOPARKAR 19th November, 2025.

31-ASWP-15334-2025.DOC decided within a period of four months from today. If that be so, the Writ Petition need not be kept pending before this Court any further.

4.

At this stage, the learned counsel for the Petitioners submits that until such time, the Revision Application is decided by the Hon'ble Minister, no bye-election of the society should be held. In response to the above, Mr. Sujit B. Padarat, learned counsel for the Respondent No.7 submits that there is no proposal to hold any byeelection in the society. 5.

In view of the above, the Writ Petition stands disposed of by directing that the Petitioners' pending Revision Application be decided within four months, in accordance with law. The Petitioners would be at liberty to seek interim relief before the concerned authority also, as and when proper cause of action arises in respect thereof.

6.

Whatever be the decision, the same be communicated to the Petitioners in writing.

(M. M. SATHAYE, J.) (SUMAN SHYAM, J.) { 19th November, 2025.