Bindu Bhasin And ANR v. District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission South Mumbai

30-WP15563-2025.DOC Santosh

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 15563 OF 2025 Bindu Bhasin and anr.

...Petitioners

Versus

District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, South Mumbai

...Respondent

SANTOSH SUBHASH KULKARNI Mr. Niyam Bhasin, for the Petitioners.

CORAM:

N. J. JAMADAR, J.

DATED:

8th DECEMBER, 2025 SANTOSH SUBHASH KULKARNI Date: 2025.12.10 09:49:54 +0530 PC:- 1.

Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioners. 2.

The learned Counsel for the petitioners, on instructions, seeks leave to withdraw the petition with liberty to file an appeal before the State Consumer Commission.

3.

The learned Counsel for the petitioners submits that since the petitioner No.1 is a 84 year old lady, the State Commission be directed to hear and decide the appeal expeditiously. 4.

In the event, the petitioners file an appeal before the State Commission within a period of three weeks, the State Commission, having regard to the age of the appellant and the circumstances of the case, is requested to make an endeavour to hear and decide the appeal as expeditiously as possible, and 1/2

30-WP15563-2025.DOC preferably, within a period of four months from the date of the first listing of the appeal before the State Commission. 5.

With the aforesaid request to the State Commission, the petition stands dismissed as withdrawn.

[N. J. JAMADAR, J.] 2/2