← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/15565/2025disposed off

Manoj Purshottam Pangarkar v. The Principal Commissioner Income Tax 1 And Others

2025-12-23Hon'Ble Shri Justice Arun R. Pedneker , Hon'Ble Justice Vaishali Patil-Jadhav2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 928 WRIT PETITION NO. 15564 OF 2025 Manoj Purshottam Pangarkar

VERSUS

The Principal Commissioner Income Tax 1 And Others 929 WRIT PETITION NO. 15565 OF 2025 Manoj Purshottam Pangarkar

VERSUS

The Principal Commissioner Income Tax 1 And Others 936 WRIT PETITION NO. 15572 OF 2025 Rashmi Manoj Pangarkar

VERSUS

The Principal Commissioner Income Tax 1 And Others Mr. R. K. Kasat, Advocate for petitioners Mr. Alok Sharma, Advocate for respondent Nos. 1 to 4

CORAM

: Smt. Vibha Kankanwadi & Hiten S. Venegavkar, JJ.

DATE : 23rd December, 2025 PER COURT :- 1.

Heard.

2.

Issue notice to the respondents. Mr. Sharma, Learned Counsel waives service of notice for respondents. 3.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that without issuing notice under Section 148-A of the Income-Tax Act, 1961, as amended with effect from 01st September, 2024, the concerned Respondent authority has directly issued notice dated 30th March, 2025 928, 929 & 936.odt

for the Assessment Year 2021-2022 under Section 148, by invoking Section 152(3) of the said Act. He further submits that the second issue involved in the case has been dealt with by this Court, was based upon Hexaware Technologies Ltd. Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, (2024) 464 ITR 430 4.

Learned counsel for the respondents submits that these are the machinery provisions and literal interpretation should not be made. He submits that the Madras High Court in case of Mark Studio India Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Income Tax Officer and Anr in Writ Petition Nos. 25223 of 2024 and 25227 of 2024 has taken a different view, and therefore, no interim protection can be granted. 5.

The coordinate Bench of this Court in the similar set of facts held such notice to be bad in law. The decision therein has been challenged before the Apex Court and the same is pending. There is no stay.

6.

In the aforesaid factual backdrop, ad-interim relief in terms of prayer clause - [D] till next date 7.

Stand over to 26th March, 2026.

(Hiten S. Venegavkar, J.) (Smt. Vibha Kankanwadi, J.) B. S. Joshi 928, 929 & 936.odt