Payal Nikhil Mittal v. Usha Balbhushan Mittal And ANR

44 WP 15828.25.DOC SAINATH

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 15828 OF 2025 Payal Nikhil Mittal ..Petitioner

Versus

Usha Balbhushan Mittal and Anr

...Respondents

Mr. Shubham Kanade (through VC), for the Petitioner. Mr. B. B. Dahiphale, AGP for the Respondent-State.

CORAM:

N. J. JAMADAR, J.

DATE :

01st DECEMBER 2025 P.C.:

1.

Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner. 2.

When the Court expressed its disinclination to entertain the petition, the learned Counsel for the petitioner seeks time to vacate the subject premises as the petitioner has been residing in the subject premises along with her 7-year-old daughter. 3.

In view of the aforesaid submissions and having regard to the facts and circumstances and with a view to facilitate the by SANTOSH SUBHASH KULKARNI Date: 2025.12.03 20:27:51 +0530 petitioner to make alternate arrangements, the petition stands SANTOSH SUBHASH KULKARNI dismissed as withdrawn with a direction to the authorities that no coercive action be taken against the petitioner for a period of four weeks from today.

4.

Stand over to 05th January, 2026.

[N. J. JAMADAR, J.] 1/1