← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/17568/2025disposed off

Kiran Vishnu Ghadage v. The State Of Maharashtra Thro. The Secretary

2025-12-24Hon'Ble Shri Justice Ravindra V. Ghuge , Hon'Ble Shri Justice Abhay J. Mantri3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

by GAYATRI RAJENDRA SHIMPI Date:

2025.12.24 18:53:29 +0530 CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION GAYATRI RAJENDRA SHIMPI WRIT PETITION NO. 17568 OF 2025 Kiran Vishnu Ghadage & Ors.

... Petitioners

Versus

The State of Maharashtra Thro. The Secretary& Ors.

... Respondents **** Mr. Suresh Pakale, Senior Advocate a/w Mr. Nilesh Desai i/by Ms. Padmaja Malgaonkar, Advocate for the Petitioners. Mr. P. P. Kakade a/w Mr. V. G. Badgujar, AGP for Respondent Nos. 1 to 5.

Mr. Ashwin Kapadnis, Advocates for Respondent Nos. 6 & 7. **** CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE AND ASHWIN D. BHOBE, JJ.

DATE : 24th DECEMBER, 2025 P.C. :

1.

An order passed at the Kolhapur Bench dated 19.12.2025, in WP No. 10270 of 2025 and connected matters, is cited before us. 2.

These Petitioners were medically examined under the Persons with Disabilities (Equal Opportunity, Protection of Rights and Full Participation) Act, 1995 and the Rules of 1996 when they were participating in the selection process. After such medical examination, they were inducted into service. Subsequently, the Rights of Persons

with Disabilities Act, 2016 and the Rules of 2017, have been introduced. These Persons are now called upon to subject themselves to re-medical examination.

3.

The learned Additional Government Pleader clarifies that this re-examination is only to the extent of assessing whether the disability or the illness is degenerative / progressive or curable. There are some employees who developed disabilities on account of unforeseen circumstances / accidents etc. after joining duties. 4.

At the Benches of this Court at Nagpur, Aurangabad and Kolhapur, the services of the Petitioners have been protected, notwithstanding that they are directed to subject themselves to medical examination. We are, therefore, granting the same relief to this Petitioner. 5.

Issue notice to the Respondents, returnable on 28th January, 2026. The learned Additional GP waives service of notice on behalf of Respondent Nos. 1 to 5 and Mr. Ashwin Kapadnis waives service on behalf of Respondent Nos 6 & 7. The service of the Petitioner would stand protected.

6.

Let Affidavit-in-Reply be filed and pleadings be completed within 10 days prior to the returnable date.

7.

All office objections shall be removed, on or before 19th January 2026, failing which, this Petition would stand dismissed without reference to the Court, on 20th January, 2026. (ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.) (RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.)