Mukesh Hiralal Mehta v. Daksha Ajay Khatlawala And Another

2(1) AO-93-86-2025.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION by HUSENBASHA RAHAMAN NADAF Date:

2025.08.14 12:49:54 +0530 HUSENBASHA RAHAMAN NADAF APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.93 OF 2025 Harish Hiralal Mehta And Anr.

...Appellant

Versus

Daksha Ajay Khatlawala & Ors.

...Respondents

WITH APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.86 OF 2025 Mukesh Hiralal Mehtra ...Appellant

Versus

Daksha Ajay Khatlawala & Ors.

...Respondents

**** Mr. Shrikrishna Ganbavale a/w. Mr. Ashok Dhanuka, Mr. Prashant Pandey, Mr. Nikhil Sonar, A. Dave, Mr. Vipul Makwana, Mr. Hitesh Gupta, Mr. Neelanjali Patil i/b. W3 Legal LLP, for Appellants. Mr. Prashant Chavan, Sr. Adv, a/w. Ms. Reshma a/w. Mr. Nirav Shah & Mr. Anuj Jaiswal i/b. Little & Co. for for Respondent Nos.1 & 2. Mr. Anant B. Shinde, for Respondent No.3.

**** CORAM : M.M. SATHAYE, J.

DATE : 13th AUGUST, 2025 P.C. :

1.

Learned counsel for the Appellants submits on instructions that since the first appeal is being entertained and delay is already condoned, the Appellants have elected to proceed with substantive first appeals and as such the appeals form order arising out of chamber summons under Order 9 Rule 13 of Civil Procedure Code may be disposed of.

Husen

2(1) AO-93-86-2025.doc 2.

In that view of the matter, the above Appeals from Order with pending interim applications therein are disposed of as not pressed. (M.M. SATHAYE, J.) Husen