Sou. Anita Vijay Gadekar v. Vijay Kisan Mali

13.AO.160.2025.doc Ajay IN IN THE THE HIGH HIGH COURT COURT OF OF JUDICATURE JUDICATURE AT AT BOMBAY BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 160 OF 2025 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 3293 OF 2025 IN APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 160 OF 2025 Anita Vijay Gadekar and Ors.

Appellants (Orig. Plaintiffs)

Versus

Vijay Kisan Mali and Anr.

..

Respondents (Orig. Defendants) ..

....................

 Mr. Eknath Dhokale, Advocate for Appellants  Mr. R.D. Soni, Advocate i/by Ram and Co. for Respondent Nos.1 and 2.

....................

CORAM

: MILIND N. JADHAV, J.

DATE : FEBRUARY 26, 2026.

P.C.:

1.

Heard Mr. Dhokale, learned Advocate for Appellants and Mr. Soni, learned Advocate for Respondent Nos.1 and 2. 2.

Mr. Dhokale, learned Advocate would submit that in view of the subsequent developments, the cause of action in the present Appeal From Order has become infructuous. On instructions, he would submit that all contentions of Appellants be expressly kept open otherwise in the proceedings which are pending before the learned Trial Court in accordance with law.

13.AO.160.2025.doc 3.

With that leave and liberty, Appeal From Order is disposed as withdrawn.

4.

In view of disposal of present Appeal From Order, interim relief granted in the present case stand vacated. 5.

In view of withdrawal of Appeal From Order, pending Interim Application No.3293 of 2025 is accordingly disposed. [ MILIND N. JADHAV, J. ] Ajay AJAY TRAMBAK UGALMUGALE Date: 2026.02.26 15:04:37 +0530 AJAY TRAMBAK UGALMUGALE