Sayed Tabassum Parvin Thr. Constituted Attorney Sayyed Mohammed Shakil Mohammed Sharif v. The Executive Engineer, (E-2) Division, Mumbai And ORS.

907 AO 213-25.os.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 213 OF 2025 Sayed Tabassum Parvin ...Appellant

Versus

The Executive Engineer, (E-2) Division, Mumbai & Ors.

...Respondents

__________ Adv. Bushra Sayed a/w Arman P. Praghya Mishra, for the Appellant. Adv. Aneesa Cheema a/w Dipti Das, Sunil Vyas, Shriya Nalawade i/b. Fox Mandal & Associates LLP, for the Respondent No.5. Ms. Sayali Apte a/w Paras Pawar i/b. P. G. Lad for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2.

__________ CORAM : GAURI GODSE, J.

DATE :

9th APRIL 2025 P.C.:

1.

This Appeal is already dismissed. Ad-interim which was operative in favour of the Appellant was extended for a period of two weeks from the date of order i.e. 2nd April 2025. 2.

The learned Counsel appearing for the Appellant submits that two weeks would expire on 16th April 2025. Since the copy of the order was not available and the same is uploaded today, the learned Counsel for the Appellant requests for extension of adinterim relief for a further period of one week. 3.

In view of the aforesaid, the ad-interim relief extended by order dated 2nd April 2025 shall continue for two weeks from today. [GAURI GODSE, J. ] Laxmi