Mr. Sharad J. Gupta v. Municipal Corporation Of Greater Mumbai Thr. Its Municipal Commissioner
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
rrpillai CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 293 OF 2025 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 8982 OF 2025 Mr. Bharat M. Chhadva ...
Appellant Vs.
Municipal Corporation of ...
Respondent Greater Mumbai through its Municipal Commissioner WITH APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 294 OF 2025 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 8270 OF 2025 Mr. Salim Mansuri ...
Appellant Vs.
Municipal Corporation of ...
Respondent Greater Mumbai through its Municipal Commissioner WITH APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 295 OF 2025 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 8271 OF 2025 Mr. Shamji M. Chhadva ...
Appellant Vs.
Municipal Corporation of ...
Respondent Greater Mumbai through its Municipal Commissioner WITH APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 296 OF 2025 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 8272 OF 2025 Digitally signed by RAJESHWARI RAMESH PILLAI Date:
2025.07.30 07:53:16 +0200 RAJESHWARI RAMESH PILLAI 1/3
Mr. Prakashchandra B. Jain ...
Appellant Vs.
Municipal Corporation of ...
Respondent Greater Mumbai through its Municipal Commissioner WITH APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 297 OF 2025 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 8273 OF 2025 Mr. Sharad J. Gupta ...
Appellant Vs.
Municipal Corporation of ...
Respondent Greater Mumbai through its Municipal Commissioner Mr. Manish Tomar a/w. Mr. Rajkumar Awasthi i/b. Mr. Pragya Mishra for all the Appellants.
Ms. Neeta Jadhav i/b. Ms. Komal Punjabi for the Respondent-BMC.
CORAM : GAURI GODSE, J.
DATE :
29th JULY 2025 ORDER :
1.
Not on board. Taken on the production board.
2.
Learned counsel for the appellants has sought production of five connected appeals, but only Appeal from 2/3
Order No. 293 of 2025 and Appeal from Order No. 294 of 2025 are listed.
3.
Appeal from Order No. 295 of 2025, Appeal from Order No. 296 of 2025 and Appeal from Order No. 297 of 2025 are not on board and are taken on production board. 4.
Learned counsel for the appellants on instructions seeks leave to withdraw all these appeals. Leave granted. Appeals are disposed of as withdrawn.
5.
In view of disposal of the appeals, interim applications are disposed of as infructuous.
[GAURI GODSE, J.] 3/3