← Library
Bombay High CourtAO/656/2025disposed off

Sharad Chokhani Huf v. Ashok Sharma And Others

2026-04-20Hon'Ble Shri Justice Milind N. Jadhav2 pages

17.AO.656.2025.doc Ajay IN IN THE THE HIGH HIGH COURT COURT OF OF JUDICATURE JUDICATURE AT AT BOMBAY BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 656 OF 2025 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 13602 OF 2025 IN APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 656 OF 2025 Sharad Chokhani HUF Appellant (Orig.

Defendant No.5)

Versus

Ashok Sharma and Ors.

.. Respondents ..

....................

 Mr. Aadil Parsurampuria, Advocate i/by Ms. Apeksha Singh for Appellant.

 Mr. Chaitanya Nikte a/w. Mr. Swapnil Sangle and Esha Malik for Respondent Nos.1 and 2.

 Ms. Sujata Bule, Advocate h/for Mr. Dilip H. Sukla for Respondent Nos.4 to 6.

 Mr. H.P. Kar a/w. Mr. Anurag Sharma, Advocates i/by Interjuris for Respondent No.3 ....................

CORAM

: MILIND N. JADHAV, J.

DATE : APRIL 20, 2026.

P.C.:

1.

Heard Mr. Parsurampuria, learned Advocate for Appellant; Mr. Nikte, learned Advocate for Respondent Nos.1 and 2; Mr. Kar, learned Advocate for Respondent No.3 and Ms. Bule, learned Advocate for Respondent Nos.4 to 6.

2.

In view of the email received by Mr. Nikte from his client Respondent No.1 - Ashok Sharma in the present case. He is agreeable

17.AO.656.2025.doc to quash the impugned order dated 29.09.2025. Copy of the email is taken on record and marked 'X' for identification. The order dated 29.09.2025 stands quashed and set aside.

3.

It is clarified that this order is set aside without prejudice to the rights and contentions of all parties without giving any imprimatur on merit. The original Commercial Suit No.505 of 2024 stands expedited.

4.

In view of the above, Appeal From Order is disposed. 5.

In view of disposal of Appeal From Order, Pending Interim Application No.13602 of 2025 is accordingly disposed. [ MILIND N. JADHAV, J. ] Ajay by AJAY TRAMBAK UGALMUGALE Date:

2026.04.20 18:14:19 +0530 AJAY TRAMBAK UGALMUGALE