Taushif Wahid Khan And Others v. The Chief Executive Officer,Slum Rehabilitation Authority And Others

905.AO.658.2025 & 914.AO.644.2025.doc Ajay IN IN THE THE HIGH HIGH COURT COURT OF OF JUDICATURE JUDICATURE AT AT BOMBAY BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

(905) APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 658 OF 2025 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 13767 OF 2025 IN APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 658 OF 2025 Taushif Wahid Khan and Ors.

.. Appellants

Versus

The Chief Executive Officer, Slum Rehabilitation Authority and Ors.

.. Respondents WITH

(914) APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 644 OF 2025 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 13564 OF 2025 IN APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 644 OF 2025 M/s. Richmond Realtors .. Appellant

Versus

Taushif Wahid Khan and Ors.

.. Respondents ....................

 Mr. Pradeep Thorat a/w. Mr. Viraj Singh and S.S. Laman for Appellants in Appeal From Order No.658 of 2025.  Mr. Sudhanya S. Bedekar, Advocate for Appellant in Appeal From Order No.644 of 2025.

 Mr. Ravi Kadam, Senior Advocate a/w. Mr. Sudhanya S. Bedekar for Respondent No.3 in Appeal From Order No.658 of 2025.  Ms. Aarushi Yadav, Advocate h/for Ravleen Sabharwal for SRA.  Ms. Neeta Jadhav, Advocate i/by Ms. Komal Punjabi for Respondent No.4 - BMC.

 Mr. Pralhad Paranjpe a/w. Mr. Aditya Lele and Mr. Swapnil Shanbhag, Advocates Respondent No.5.

....................

CORAM

: MILIND N. JADHAV, J.

DATE : DECEMBER 05, 2025.

P.C.:

905.AO.658.2025 & 914.AO.644.2025.doc APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.658 OF 2025 1.

Heard Mr. Thorat, learned Advocate for Appellants in Appeal From Order No.658 of 2025; Mr. Bedekar, learned Advocate for Appellant in Appeal From Order No.644 of 2025; Mr. Kadam, learned Senior Advocate for Respondent No.3 in Appeal From Order No.658 of 2025; Ms. Yadav, learned Advocate for SRA; Ms. Jadhav, learned Advocate Respondent No.4 - BMC and Mr. Paranjpe, learned Advocate for Respondent No.5.

2.

After hearing Mr. Thorat, learned Advocate for Appellants and expressing my disinclination to grant ad-interim / interim relief, Mr. Thorat on taking instructions would submit that Appellants desire to withdraw the Appeal From Order.

3.

In that view of the matter, Appeal From Order is disposed of as withdrawn.

4.

In view of withdrawal of Appeal From Order, pending Interim Application No.13767 of 2025 is accordingly disposed. APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.644 OF 2025 5.

In view of the disposal of Appeal From Order No.658 of 2025, present Appeal From Order is also disposed. 6.

Pending Interim Application No.13564 of 2025 in this Appeal From Order is also disposed accordingly. [ MILIND N. JADHAV, J. ] Ajay AJAY TRAMBAK UGALMUGALE Date: 2025.12.06 15:45:24 +0530 AJAY TRAMBAK UGALMUGALE